Evaluating (ln^2) in Easy Math Problem: X=Xo*e^(ln^2/Td)*T | Answer: Xo=17

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmed90
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the expression (ln^2) in the equation X = Xo * [e^(ln^2)/Td] * T, where specific values for X, Td, and T are provided. Participants express confusion over the notation (ln^2), questioning its definition and how it relates to the calculation of Xo, which is determined to be 17. Clarification is sought on whether (ln^2) should be interpreted differently, as it is not a standard mathematical notation. Ultimately, the original poster resolves their confusion, indicating they found the answer. The conversation highlights the importance of clear mathematical notation in problem-solving.
bmed90
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
So if

Equation: X=Xo*[e^(ln^2)/Td] * T

with

X = 5e12
Td = 15
T= 672

And the answer is Xo=17


My question: is how do I evaluate (ln^2) ??
Usually when I use the ln function to calculate something its like ln(5/2)^2 or something like that but here its just ln^2


what does this mean? How do you get 17 for Xo
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Wait ##\ln ^2##? That's not defined. Maybe it should be just ln(2)
 
I used ln(2) but that did not give me an answer of 17
 
Nvm I got. Thanks
 
I think it would have funny if you had posted some unproven conjecture and then moments later posted "nvm, got it."

Just a thought..
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top