I Evaluating Scattering Integral

Waxterzz
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I really don't have a clue to solve this.

1SR45bL.png
I tried something like the dirac function identity:

utoxnMx.png


But then I saw it's dk' not dk' and couldn't got it straight.

Can someone help me with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As it is said, you have to change to spherical coordinates. The Dirac delta will then only affect the integral over r.
 
DrClaude said:
As it is said, you have to change to spherical coordinates. The Dirac delta will then only affect the integral over r.

I don't see it. dk' is not a volume element?
 
1a83c429226b2c6a2da143ae35a00751.png


dk' is a vector. Then I have an integral comprising of 3 terms each involving unit vectors.

I really don't have a clue.
 
Wait wait, I am extremely confused.

I just have to integrate over the k' first?
 
Mr
DrClaude said:
As it is said, you have to change to spherical coordinates. The Dirac delta will then only affect the integral over r.
6 hours and I still have no clue, can you please hold my hand and solve it with me. I mean, just say what I have to do, I will solve it, but give me instructions.

I mean what's the deal with the dirac function and the dk', it's supposed to be a volume element and the dirac term, why isn't it delta(k-k')
 
##d\vec{k}## is a volume element. Write it as a volume element in spherical coordinate. To make the integrand even more transparent, use the cosine law to express ##|\vec{k}-\vec{k'}|^2## in terms of ##k##, ##k'##, and ##\theta##.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
##d\vec{k}## is a volume element. Write it as a volume element in spherical coordinate. To make the integrand even more transparent, use the cosine law to express ##|\vec{k}-\vec{k'}|^2## in terms of ##k##, ##k'##, and ##\theta##.
mW21BmR.png


How come dk' is a volume element, it's the derivative of a vector. Most textbooks, the volume element is called a d tau or a dV

My head is a mess. It's like I completely forgot how to calculus.

Good news: I know I'm wrong.

Really don't see it
 
What happened to the Dirac delta? You should do the integral over k' first.
 
  • #10
Waxterzz said:
How come dk' is a volume element, it's the derivative of a vector. Most textbooks, the volume element is called a d tau or a dV
It's not a derivative, it is an infinitesimal vector element.
 
  • #11
DrClaude said:
It's not a derivative, it is an infinitesimal vector element.

It's been this the whole time?, with r being k'

eqn_vol_e.gif


Ps: After this I'm going to finally learn LaTeX
 
  • #12
Why did the Dirac delta disappear in the second equation from the last one?
 
  • #13
TEAEU8n.png
sv97Qux.png


This is what I got uptil now, but I have to leave.

Thanks for help, give me feedback if you want to, and I will post update when I'm back, probably tomorrow. Thanks for the patience anyway!
 
  • #14
DrClaude said:
It's not a derivative, it is an infinitesimal vector element.

blue_leaf77 said:
Why did the Dirac delta disappear in the second equation from the last one?

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply.

Hope this is somewhat more clear, because last post was a bit messy. Still haven't learned LaTex.

34XvfUc.png


Is this valid?

I couldn't evaluatie the last integral, because of the square.

Do I need to use partial fractions?

Thanks
 
  • #15
Hi myself,

I found out I need to include something like 1- ( stuff going in the z direction after k scattering) / (stuff that would go in z direction if there was no scattering at all), so 1 - k' projected on z axis /k = 1 - (k cos theta) / k

Yes, I'm a noob.

So I'll start over. :')
 
Back
Top