Evaluating the non-relativistic Action

  • Thread starter Thread starter wam_mi
  • Start date Start date
wam_mi
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider the classical action (m/2) \int dt \dot{x}^{2} where m is the mass of the non-relativistic point particle, and \dot{x} = dx/dt .

This classical path starts at (x_{1}, t_{1}) and ends at (x_{2}, t_{2}). Could someone help me evaluate this classical action explicitly please?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wam_mi said:

Homework Statement



Consider the classical action (m/2) \int dt \dot{x}^{2} where m is the mass of the non-relativistic point particle, and \dot{x} = dx/dt .

This classical path starts at (x_{1}, t_{1}) and ends at (x_{2}, t_{2}). Could someone help me evaluate this classical action explicitly please?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Thanks a lot!


Simply add the time bounds of the path to the integral to get

(m/2) \int^{t_2}_{t_1} \dot{x}^{2}dt.

Now turn this into a position-bounded integral as follows:

(m/2) \int^{t_2}_{t_1} \dot{x}^{2}dt=(m/2) \int^{x_2}_{x_1} \dot{x}dx.

Finally take the time derivative out of integrand and solve the integral!

AB
 
Altabeh said:
Simply add the time bounds of the path to the integral to get

(m/2) \int^{t_2}_{t_1} \dot{x}^{2}dt.

Now turn this into a position-bounded integral as follows:

(m/2) \int^{t_2}_{t_1} \dot{x}^{2}dt=(m/2) \int^{x_2}_{x_1} \dot{x}dx.

Finally take the time derivative out of integrand and solve the integral!

AB

Hi there,

Could you kindly explain why one can turn the time-bounded integral into a position-bounded integral?

Thanks a lot!
 
wam_mi said:
Hi there,

Could you kindly explain why one can turn the time-bounded integral into a position-bounded integral?

Thanks a lot!

As in the classical theory of action integrals, the bounds must be either spatial or temporal, so we cannot do the analysis over the dynamics of particles along a bounded path with both elements of time and space simultaneously. So in the integral in question, you can use the chain rule to kill two of time differentials dt by expanding one of \dot{x}'s and cancelling out dt's to only have a dx left behind. The remaining is straightforward to be treated. Since now integral element is dx, so the bound must be spatial and then you can easily factor the operator d/dt out of the integral to get

\frac{m}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int^{x_2}_{x_1} x dx.

Is it all clear now?

AB
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top