Evaluation of a divergent series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter standardflop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergent Series
standardflop
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hello,
according to theory of alternating series, the series \sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n is not convergent, correct?. Howcome maple estimates it as \sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^n = 0.5000000000. This seems strange to me.. Why this strange result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maple clearly has a bug in it! I suspect it has calculated for very large n, calculated for n+ 1 and since they were different, averaged the two answers!
 
It's not a bug, but related to how Maple handles infinite sums. From the description of Maple's sum command:

"Note that sum knows about various resummation methods and will thus be able to give the 'correct' value for various classes of divergent sums. If one wants to restrict summation to convergent sums, then explicit convergence checks must be done."

I'm not sure what method it's using in this case, but it agrees with Cesaro summation, where you essentially take the average of the partial sums. Even though your series is Cesaro summable, it's still divergent in the 'usual' sense (though maple doesn't report this).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top