Evanescent waves, wavevector, and Poynting vector

AI Thread Summary
The wavevector k for evanescent waves points in a complex direction, with real and imaginary components that describe propagation and exponential decay, respectively. In total internal reflection, k has a real component parallel to the surface and an imaginary component perpendicular to it. The magnitude of k varies, with the real part representing the wave number and the imaginary part indicating the decay rate. The relationship between k and the Poynting vector is complex; while they generally point in the same direction, this is not always true in anisotropic materials or left-handed materials, where they can diverge. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing wave behavior in various media.
wil3
Messages
177
Reaction score
1
For an evanescent wave, in what direction does the wavevector k point? In several lectures that I've seen in class, it appears to point in some direction that is not normal or along the interface, which confuses me.

Additionally, for all wave vectors, what exactly is the magnitude of k? In the 1D case, I'm aware that it is a simply the wave number, but does it have any special meaning in other cases?

Finally, what is the relationship between k and the Poynting vector? I'm aware that they necessarily point in the same direction, but I'm curious if there's a relationship between their magnitudes.

These concepts were very poorly explained in lecture, and so I would appreciate any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several circumstances where you find inhomogeneous or evanescent waves. In all of them the wave vector k is complex, implying that the wave is exponentially damped in some direction.

a) Total internal reflection, in which case the wave vector has a real component parallel to the surface and an imaginary one perpendicular to it.

b) Wave propagation in a conducting medium such as a metal. In this case the wave is exponentially damped in the same direction as the direction of propagation.

c) Some diffraction problems (see Born & Wolf, sect 11.4)

Which direction does k point and what is its magnitude? Well, k is complex! So it points in a complex direction. You can define in the usual way a phase velocity vector, index of refraction, dielectric constant, but they will all be complex too.
 
wil3 said:
Finally, what is the relationship between k and the Poynting vector? I'm aware that they necessarily point in the same direction, but I'm curious if there's a relationship between their magnitudes.

Not necessarily true, actually. In an anisotropic material where the index of refraction varies with direction, the electric field may not be perpendicular to the propogation vector (although the displacement field will be). This leads to a Poynting vector which is not parallel to k.
 
johng23 said:
Not necessarily true, actually. In an anisotropic material where the index of refraction varies with direction, the electric field may not be perpendicular to the propogation vector (although the displacement field will be). This leads to a Poynting vector which is not parallel to k.

The Poynting vector can also point in the opposite direction from the wavevector in left-handed materials (meta-materials). The Poynting vector describes the direction of energy flow, and the wavevector describes the direction that the waveform is traveling.

A complex vector like k has real and imaginary parts, and each part has vector length (magnitude) and vector directionality. The vector length of the real part of the wavevector is just the wavenumber (a description of the spatial frequency of wave peaks). The vector directionality of the real part describes the directions the waveshape is traveling. The vector length of the imaginary part describes the rate at which the wave spatially decays, and the vector directionality of the imaginary part described the direction in which the wave is decaying.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top