Evaporation of a mostly sealed erlenmeyer flask

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slimjimi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evaporation flask
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the evaporation rate of a 3L Erlenmeyer flask with a rubber stopper featuring a small hole for a drip line. The user anticipates nearly 100% relative humidity inside the flask, which will affect the mass measurements over several days. Key points include the challenge of air movement affecting evaporation and the suggestion to minimize the gap around the drip line. The user plans to conduct experiments to compare static and dynamic evaporation rates while determining how the volumetric flow rate correlates with evaporation. The overall goal is to accurately measure mass changes while accounting for evaporation.
Slimjimi
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to determine whether the evaporation rate of a 3L erlenmeyer flask would be negligible given the following circumstances. The flask would have a rubber stopper in it, with a hole approximately 1mm in radius greater than the steel drip line feeding into it (leaving an open ring that has an outer diameter of ~8mm and an inner diameter of ~6mm). I would like to take realtime mass measurements as the drip line does it's thing. The process would span several days, so evaporation has to be taken into account. The process is drawn roughly here:

H2OCollection.png


Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would expect ~100% relative humidity inside, with a water density depending on the temperature of the environment. If you add a volume of X, the same volume of (humid) air leaves the flask and takes away some mass.

Apart from that, it is probably hard to evaluate, as the air movement inside+outside is important. Can you reduce the gap somehow? If you do not have to measure the weight continuously, maybe you can close it most of the time.
Can you determine it experimentally? Just fill it with your fluid, wait one day and compare the mass?
 
Ahh, yes, I was thinking of the evaporation rate in a static system. But since we'll be adding water to the flask (at a rate less than 1mL/min), each drop will push out a corresponding amount of humid vapor. Good point mfb. I worked on minimizing the gap yesterday, once I've completed that, I will experimentally determine the difference between static and dynamic evaporation. Furthermore, I'll have to find the function that relates the volumetric flow rate in and the evaporation rate.

Thanks!
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top