Evaporation of juice containing carbon

  • Thread starter Thread starter trenthoskings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Evaporation
AI Thread Summary
Juice containing added carbon is harder to evaporate than juice without it, primarily due to the physical properties of carbon affecting the evaporation process. The carbon, likely in the form of powdered charcoal or porous chunks, is used to remove unwanted compounds from the grape juice. More steam is required to evaporate the carbon-infused juice, indicating that the presence of carbon alters the evaporation efficiency. The discussion also raises questions about the nature of the carbon used and the final product of the evaporation process. Understanding these factors is essential for optimizing the evaporation of carbon-containing juices.
trenthoskings
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
as a process worker may someone with more technical knowledge answer question below please

1. we have a juice which contains some Carbon.I am finding it harder to evaporate due to the Carbon.Why is juice harder to evaporate with Carbon in it then juice without Carbon?

Cheers

Trent H
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
trenthoskings said:
we have a juice which contains some Carbon.I am finding it harder to evaporate due to the Carbon.Why is juice harder to evaporate with Carbon in it then juice without Carbon?

http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif Hi trenthoskings!

If you are able to give more information, someone might be able to suggest a theory. By "juice" I presume you mean the juice of an edible fruit or vegetable? All such juices contain lots of carbon atoms, along with hydrogen and oxygen and others. I can't imagine that you mean contamination with soot particles, so maybe the lack of responses to your query means that other readers are as mystified as I am.

It sounds an intriguing observation, so can you elaborate?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi NascentOxygen

Sorry for late responce.Thanks for your reply

Yes the grape juice had Carbon added to the juice to help remove certain compounds.It was harder to evaporate the juice with the added Carbon then juice without the added Carbon.

The juice was send through a Evaporator using Steam as the heating source.More steam was needed to evaporate the Carbon juice then the non-carbon juice

Thanks

Trent
 
Hi trenthoskings. So the carbon was what? Powdered charcoal, or chunks of porous carbon? It was allowed to settle out, was it? Or it came to the surface and was skimmed off?

So we can be sure there was really none of this carbon additive itself in what went to the evaporator?

I'm curious to know why grape juice goes to an evaporator? Is this to make a condensed syrup, or what is the final product?

What unwanted compounds are the carbon removing? Are these compounds recovered for industrial use in another part of the factory?

I'll login and look for your reply in about a month's time? :smile:
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top