Everything attracts everything else; F = GMm/r^2. If two objects are

  • Thread starter Thread starter eurekameh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Two objects with everyday masses placed in a frictionless environment will eventually attract each other due to gravitational force, as described by F = GMm/r^2. While the gravitational force is tiny at everyday distances, it is sufficient to overcome friction if no other forces are present. Calculations suggest that two 1 kg point masses separated by 1 meter could come into contact in approximately 26.7 to 34 hours, which feels surprisingly short given the context of gravity's effects in daily life. Experiments to observe this attraction could include using a torsion balance or placing objects in a vacuum or free space. The discussion highlights the counterintuitive nature of gravitational attraction in everyday scenarios.
eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
Everything attracts everything else; F = GMm/r^2.
If two objects are placed at an everyday-experience distance to each other and have everyday-experience masses on ice, where no other forces are exerted on the two-mass system besides the mutual gravitation attraction, will the two masses eventually bring each other closer together if given enough time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If absolutely no other forces are involved? Yes.

For everyday distances and masses, the forces are pretty tiny, and in a realistic setting, I doubt such a force could overcome even the force of static friction with the ice.
 


Realistically, no, this would not happen because friction would keep them from moving. But if we could place two objects in a frictionless environment then yes, they would get closer together.
 


How long would it take, really, for let's say, two 1 kg point masses separated at 1 m apart, to come into contact with each other (again, assuming they're both on frictionless ice).
According to my calculations, which I doubt I've done correctly, I've got ~34 hours, which seems to be an extremely short amount of time when compared with intuition.
 
Last edited:


Why does that seem short?
 


The fact that gravity makes things come closer together is foreign to me, even if the concept of gravity is not, because we just don't see mundane things in everyday life do such a thing. So the idea that if you place two objects in a frictionless environment and it will come into contact with one another in just a matter of a day and some hours is just so strange.
 


Well, I haven't done the numbers, but I can see it. Remember that gravity is constant, and it will continually accelerate the two objects towards each other. The fact that they are so small means it takes a very long time for them to get even the tiniest velocity. This contrasts to the Earth which will accelerate you to 9.8 m/s in just 1 second.
 


We can skip the ice and just put them in free space. The space station or the now out of service shuttle would be excellent environments and one would think that they would have done it with two blobs of water.

Another possibility would be to put two buoyant spheres in water. Surface tension would present a bit of an issue there, though.

How else might we play this game?

How about an air hockey table?
 


Without paying careful attention (i.e. setting up a real experiment), you'll never see the gravitational attraction between everyday objects.

One cool thing you can set up that can see this attraction is called a torsion balance. You can wikipedia it for details, but basically its a mechanism that translates the gravitational attraction between several bodies into rotational momentum of a rod: which is much easier to see.
 
  • #10


eurekameh said:
I've got ~34 hours, which seems to be an extremely short amount of time when compared with intuition.
I make the formula (π/4)√(d3/Gm), where d is the initial separation. That gives 26.7 hours.
 
Back
Top