- #71
- 8,142
- 1,756
jostpuur said:Is there something suspicious about Randi's power to accept and reject who ever he wants? Scientific journals also choose who they allow to publish, but you don't have problem with that? Have there been incidents that suggest that Randi has abused his power?.
We have no way to know and that's part of the problem. But the point is moot. The forum rules clearly define what is acceptable as a scientific reference, and what's not. These rules apply to every forum at PF. Only papers published in an appropriate, mainstream, peer-reviewed journal, may be used as a scientific reference.
Just to be clear, this is not a point for discussion. The rules are the rules, and there is nothing special about Randi except that he has a million dollars to lose.
[late edit] As for journals not publishing qualified work: The scientific process is self-correcting. While it may take time [even centuries, as is the case with the so-called "legend of the milky sea"], eventually science will recognize the merits of valid claims. We have no reason to believe that Randi's challenge is self-correcting.
Last edited: