!Evidence of Star Formation in Molecular Clouds

AI Thread Summary
Molecular clouds are recognized as the primary sites of star formation due to their dense, cold environments that facilitate the accumulation of gas and dust. Observations of young star clusters, such as the Pleiades, provide evidence of recent star formation, with ages estimated between 75 and 150 million years based on stellar evolution models. The presence of nebulae, often referred to as stellar nurseries, indicates ongoing star formation processes, as they contain both young stars and the materials necessary for new star creation. The Spitzer Telescope has identified thousands of planetary disks, further supporting the notion of active star formation in these regions. Overall, the combination of observational data from star clusters, nebulae, and planetary disks illustrates that star formation is a continuous and dynamic process in the universe.
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
What evidence do we have that stars are forming right now?

Molecular clouds? why do we know that molecular clouds are where stars form? any other lines of evidence? i know this is a big topic so a few reasons or a good link would be a good start for me to understand this big topic

thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Though it is difficult to watch real-time, we can see stars in all stages of their lifespan, including formation itself. The Pleiades, for example, is a star cluster that formed relatively recently, the stars are young...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleiades_(star_cluster )
It is dominated by young, hot blue stars...

Ages for star clusters can be estimated by comparing the H-R diagram for the cluster with theoretical models of stellar evolution, and using this technique, ages for the Pleiades of between 75 and 150 million years have been estimated.
Heh - and learn something new every day. I thought the nebulosity of the cluster was left-over from its formation, but apparently not:
It was formerly thought that the dust was left over from the formation of the cluster, but at the age of about 100 million years generally accepted for the cluster, almost all the dust originally present would have been dispersed by radiation pressure. Instead, it seems that the cluster is simply passing through a particularly dusty region of the interstellar medium.
Here is a picture of "stellar nursery": http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960816.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Like Russ said, you can examine many different nebulae and see the different stages of star formation (the whole process is too long to watch). There's still a lot of virgin material out there ready to make new stars.
 
The Spitzer Telescope alone has found thousands (yes thousands) of planetary disks (stellar accretion areas).

The following is a recent survey of 2300 in the Orion nebula...

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2006-099
 
thanks Geo. Cam on ban nhe.
 
Yeh as the guys above have said you can look at nebulae which are, as I am sure you know, generally thought of as stellar nurseries due to it being a dark, cold environment which is good for star forming (stellar winds push protostar material away).

Evidence for recently 'turned on' stars (hydrogen fusion begun) is say a star in a nebula which is glowing brightly but tightly surrounded by dust and gas save for a small pocket just outside the star, showing it is in the process of pushing this material away

dunno if that helps
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top