Evolutionary Benefit of Odd Music Rhythms

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmar9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Music
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evolutionary benefits of human rhythm capabilities, particularly focusing on complex rhythms such as jazz beats and syncopation. Participants explore various theories regarding the origins and functions of these rhythmic abilities, considering aspects of culture, social interaction, and potential survival advantages.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that rhythm capabilities may have evolved from bipedalism, enhancing repetitive movement skills necessary for survival activities like running and dodging.
  • Others propose that complex rhythms might serve social or spiritual functions within ancient tribes, potentially aiding in kinship reinforcement or sexual selection.
  • A few participants argue that not all traits need to have an evolutionary advantage, suggesting that rhythm capabilities could be a spandrel, a byproduct of other evolutionary developments.
  • There is mention of the music of Baka and Mbenga peoples, noted for its complexity, as possibly one of the oldest musical systems, raising questions about the evolutionary significance of such music.
  • Some participants raise the idea that understanding and mimicking natural sounds that do not adhere to common time signatures could provide evolutionary advantages.
  • Discussion includes the notion that human rhythm may be influenced by natural patterns observed in animals, with references to how four-footed creatures might prefer certain rhythmic gaits.
  • Several comments reflect on the subjective experience of rhythm, suggesting that music can influence emotions and behaviors, which may have social implications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the evolutionary significance of rhythm, with no clear consensus reached. Some agree on the potential social and cultural roles of rhythm, while others emphasize the lack of necessity for evolutionary advantages.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on various assumptions regarding the definitions of rhythm and evolutionary biology, and participants explore the implications of these concepts without resolving the underlying complexities.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying evolutionary biology, anthropology, musicology, and the psychology of music and rhythm.

jmar9
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Summary: what is the evolutionary benefit of human rhythm capability

It seems that most of the human capabilities and senses developed from some feature that had a survival benefit. But the capability to maintain complex rhythms doesn't seem to confer any benefits. For example a 4/4 rhythm might have come from walking. But a complex rhythms such as 11/7, jazz beats, and syncopation don't seem to offer any survival benefits. So where did this capability arise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This falls under adaptive (cultural) experience, language and human plasticity. Let's put it in Art, Music, History, and Linguistics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Brian DAmato
In this Wikipedia article, the development of music may have come bipedalism.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_musicology
It seems it’s benefits are to improve our repetitive movement skills. This could include running, dodging, and combat. In some ways, it reminds me of the movie A River Runs Through It where Brad Pitt does a marvelous flycast that required great timing and rhythm and the physics of motion not to mention artistry.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Brian DAmato, Asymptotic and pinball1970
jmar9 said:
Summary: what is the evolutionary benefit of human rhythm capability

It seems that most of the human capabilities and senses developed from some feature that had a survival benefit. But the capability to maintain complex rhythms doesn't seem to confer any benefits. For example a 4/4 rhythm might have come from walking. But a complex rhythms such as 11/7, jazz beats, and syncopation don't seem to offer any survival benefits. So where did this capability arise?
Drums and music would have had spiritual and social content with ancient tribes.
Is there any evidence of these time signatures being used by extant tribes in Australia, Africa, south America or Island tribes?

I have only ever heard straight 4/4 types (from films, documentaries, news media)

I do not think I have ever heard waltz time either.

I have heard syncopation from a Iraqi/Kurdish bands (I have drummed in a few) and some of those roots I imagine are very old and go back to their tribal origins.

Same as per a Dervish concert I recently attended (In Manchester of all places)

Evolutionary advantage? Sexual ritual? Or just something to distinguish themselves from other tribes and re-inforce kinship as seen in other social rituals seems to be the indication from the wiki links.

A more complicated rhythm would stand out and attract a mate?

An analogy could be all those little trills and ornaments in some Asian traditional music, the guy with biggest range may get the pick of the crop.

Birds use the same technique.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic and berkeman
Not every trait needs to have an evolutionary advantage. It might be a spandrel.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ryan_m_b
I use to put it this way: I am no Tibetan monk. So music (rhythms) are an easy method to influence my autonomic nervous system.

This means: One can gain self-confidence, concentration, aggression, calming, etc. by certain kinds of music (rhythms). Something which otherwise would require a level of self-control I'm not capable of.

Soldiers sing tunes while walking, tennis players enter the arena with an earplug listening to music, couples talk about "their" song, etc. All these examples are in my opinions evidence for what I said.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic, QuantumQuest and jedishrfu
Soldiers singing and the power of music to inspire and alert reminded me of this scene from Gunga Din:

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
jmar9 said:
But the capability to maintain complex rhythms doesn't seem to confer any benefits.
Sometimes evolution just runs wild on a road it started, and this might lead to results without benefits (or even seems detrimental sometimes).
It is enough if it had benefit of some kind before, in its some previous state. Just think about some excess headgears on (male) mammals...
 
Dave Brubeck did have six children.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kith and jedishrfu
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
Dave Brubeck did have six children.
Not 5?
 
  • #11
That's actually the only track on that album not written by Brubeck. It was written by Paul Desmond.
 
  • #13
Vanadium 50 said:
Dave Brubeck did have six children.
"Take Five" ---- and you see that some people ARE explorers, even in fields of Art.
 
  • #14
Vanadium 50 said:
That's actually the only track on that album not written by Brubeck. It was written by Paul Desmond.
OKay, so maybe both of them were musical explorers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
  • #15
Vanadium 50 said:
Dave Brubeck did have six children.
JS Bach had more than that, but that was because his organ had no stops.
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic and pinball1970
  • #16
Okay folks, humor has its limits here lest we venture into more colorful territory so let's get back to the thread's main theme.
 
  • #17
pinball1970 said:
Evolutionary advantage? Sexual ritual? Or just something to distinguish themselves from other tribes and re-inforce kinship as seen in other social rituals seems to be the indication from the wiki links.

A more complicated rhythm would stand out and attract a mate?

An analogy could be all those little trills and ornaments in some Asian traditional music, the guy with biggest range may get the pick of the crop.

Birds use the same technique.
That was my first thought as well.
 
  • #18
Plenty of things justify their existence without recourse to evolutionary biology and natural selection 'just so' narratives.

The music of Baka and Mbenga ('pygmy') peoples of central africa is likely one of the oldest surviving musical systems. It is both polyphonic and rhythmically complex

 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Asymptotic
  • #19
BWV said:
Plenty of things justify their existence without recourse to evolutionary biology and natural selection 'just so' narratives.

The music of Baka and Mbenga ('pygmy') peoples of central africa is likely one of the oldest surviving musical systems. It is both polyphonic and rhythmically complex


It's old and it evolved
 
Last edited:
  • #20
 
  • #21
A related question worth investigating is, "what sounds in the natural world don't adhere to quadruple meter (4/4 time)?". Identify what they are, then evaluate whether being able to understand and/or mimic them provides an evolutionary advantage.
 
  • #22
Asymptotic said:
A related question worth investigating is, "what sounds in the natural world don't adhere to quadruple meter (4/4 time)?".

Do four-footed creatures prefer an evenly-timed gait ? That would be interesting, especially if they use 4/4's characteristic emphasis pattern (strong, weak, medium, weak).

As far as odd-denominator metres are concerned, I imagine artistic license, rather than a natural groove.

I've heard 5/ 7/ and 9/ done so smoothly it seems perfectly natural (right up until somebody tries to dance to it). For myself, I think 11+/ would require some effort on the part of the listener.

The Grateful Dead in concert had a song that technically would be a 17/, but that was really 4x4/ + a pause.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
  • #23
hmmm27 said:
Do four-footed creatures prefer an evenly-timed gait ? That would be interesting, especially if they use 4/4's characteristic emphasis pattern (strong, weak, medium, weak).

As far as odd-denominator metres are concerned, I imagine artistic license, rather than a natural groove.

I've heard 5/ 7/ and 9/ done so smoothly it seems perfectly natural (right up until somebody tries to dance to it). For myself, I think 11+/ would require some effort on the part of the listener.

The Grateful Dead in concert had a song that technically would be a 17/, but that was really 4x4/ + a pause.
Horses canter straight but Gallop as a shuffle.

Tribes may have picked up on that sort of thing from nature, the human brain likes interesting patterns and history tells us these tribes like to imitate it whether it's cave art or animal rhythms.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic and symbolipoint
  • #24
pinball1970 said:
Tribes may have picked up on that sort of thing from nature, the human brain likes interesting patterns and history tells us these tribes like to imitate it whether it's cave art or animal rhythms.

Perhaps binary is the actual natural base : 5|10 being just some freak evolutionary sidetrack. It would explain why my cat sucks at arithmetic : her natural proclivity is towards base 2.
 
  • #25
hmmm27 said:
Perhaps binary is the actual natural base : 5|10 being just some freak evolutionary sidetrack. It would explain why my cat sucks at arithmetic : her natural proclivity is towards base 2.
There are some profound differences between shuffle and straight in terms of feel although they are both 4/4.
Dance music uses these rhythms and those tribal genes chiming could be one of the reasons why it was so popular.
The complex ones I think are a much later modification.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
  • #26
hmmm27 said:
Perhaps binary is the actual natural base : 5|10 being just some freak evolutionary sidetrack. It would explain why my cat sucks at arithmetic : her natural proclivity is towards base 2.
@symbolipoint referred to this. Spandrel
 
  • #27
pinball1970 said:
@symbolipoint referred to this. Spandrel
I did not know what you meant until I made a quick search on internet and found and read very briefly a wikipedia article on "spandrel".
 
  • #28
symbolipoint said:
I did not know what you meant until I made a quick search on internet and found and read very briefly a wikipedia article on "spandrel".
Me too and my 'strong point' is biology supposedly. Never heard of it till his post.
 
  • #29
Asymptotic said:
A related question worth investigating is, "what sounds in the natural world don't adhere to quadruple meter (4/4 time)?". Identify what they are, then evaluate whether being able to understand and/or mimic them provides an evolutionary advantage.

Here is Messiaen's transcription of a prairie chicken with barred as 2/16 | 2/8 | 3/16| 2/8

Prairie_Chicken.jpg


cant really call walking 4/4 time. Obviously walking involves two legs so a walking rhythm would have an even number of beats, but the meter could be anything - 2/4 6/4 8/4 whatever (and equivalently 2/8 2/2 etc)

Musical traditions of the near east and India all have rhythms that are combinations of 2 and 3 beat patterns
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
  • #30
pinball1970 said:
Me too and my 'strong point' is biology supposedly. Never heard of it till his post.
I think something is confused here, between two very different topics of the forum. "Spandrel" was related to evolution of dogs from wolves, about the raising the inner eyebrow? Not about evolution of odd rhythms?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
82
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K