EVT and Fermats to prove f'(c)=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter NWeid1
  • Start date Start date
NWeid1
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If f is differentiable on the interval [a,b] and f'(a)<0<f'(b), prove that there is a c with a<c<b for which f'(c)=0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I first tried to use IVT but I was having a hard time to I talked to my prof. and he said to use extreme value theorem and fermats theorem. So, by EVT, I know there will be an aboslute maximum and absolute minimum on [a,b]. By f'(a)<0<f'(b) I know that it will be decreasing and increasing and therefore will have a local miniimum on (a,b). Fermats theorem then says that if f(c) is a local extremum, then c must be a critical number of f. Which means the function WILL have a c to make f'(c)=0. I know this intuitively but I'm having a hard time rigorously proving it.
 

Attachments

  • Whelk-Graph1OverX.jpg
    Whelk-Graph1OverX.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 425
Physics news on Phys.org
no one?
 
NWeid1 said:

Homework Statement


If f is differentiable on the interval [a,b] and f'(a)<0<f'(b), prove that there is a c with a<c<b for which f'(c)=0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I first tried to use IVT but I was having a hard time to I talked to my prof. and he said to use extreme value theorem and fermats theorem. So, by EVT, I know there will be an aboslute maximum and absolute minimum on [a,b]. By f'(a)<0<f'(b) I know that it will be decreasing and increasing and therefore will have a local miniimum on (a,b).
Please state the foregoing without "it". What you have written is very unclear. "It" could refer to f'(a), 0, or f'(b). I suspect that none of these is the antecedent.
NWeid1 said:
Fermats theorem then says that if f(c) is a local extremum, then c must be a critical number of f. Which means the function WILL have a c to make f'(c)=0. I know this intuitively but I'm having a hard time rigorously proving it.
 
Well, I first tried to use IVT but I was having a hard time to I talked to my prof. and he said to use extreme value theorem and fermats theorem. So, by EVT, I know that f will have an aboslute maximum and absolute minimum on [a,b]. By f'(a)<0<f'(b) I know that f will be decreasing and increasing and therefore will have a local miniimum on (a,b). Fermats theorem then says that if f(c) is a local extremum, then c must be a critical number of f. Which means the function WILL have a c to make f'(c)=0. I know this intuitively but I'm having a hard time rigorously proving it.
 
Can you say this more precisely?
NWeid1 said:
By f'(a)<0<f'(b) I know that f will be decreasing and increasing

Where will f be decreasing?
Where will f be increasing?

If you haven't guessed, I'm trying to get you to make clear, unambiguous statements.
 
f will be decreasing on (a,o) and increasing on (0,b)
 
NWeid1 said:
f will be decreasing on (a,o) and increasing on (0,b)

Not necessarily. We only know that the slope of f(x) at a is negative, and the slope of f(x) at b is positive. We don't know the exact intervals f is increasing or decreasing.

NWeid1 said:
f'(a)<0<f'(b)
 
NWeid1 said:
f will be decreasing on (a,o) and increasing on (0,b)
In addition to what gb7nash said, you are assuming here that a < 0 and b > 0. All you have is the interval [a, b]. There is no indication of whether 0 is in the interval, to the left of it, or to the right of it. It's just some arbitrary interval.
 
Back
Top