Exam Prep: Electric Field - Is It Zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the electric field between two charged sheets. It questions whether the electric field is zero when using a Gaussian surface that encloses both sheets. Participants clarify that the electric field between two oppositely charged sheets is not zero; rather, it is uniform and directed from the positive to the negative sheet. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing the configuration of charged plates and their effect on the electric field. Ultimately, the electric field between the sheets is significant and should not be assumed to be zero.
bluesteels
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Two infinite plane sheets with uniform surface charge densities
+ sigma and - sigma are placed parallel to each other with separation d.
In the region between the sheets, where does the total electric
field have the greatest magnitude?
Relevant Equations
concept Q.
Screen Shot 2022-03-01 at 9.39.04 PM.png


I'm having an exam soon so i want to make sure. Is the electric field here zero?? cause if i draw gauss surface covering both of them they should cancel out or am i wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are asked about the field between the sheets. How is drawing a surface enclosing both going to help with that?
 
What does this structure remind you? I mean two opposite charge sheets (or plates if that rings a bell) and the E-field in between them...
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'

Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'

Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

No Electric Charges if No Electric Field in Region
Replies
22
Views
2K
Use of imaginary charge vs Gauss' law
Replies
12
Views
936
Gauss' Law for a conducting / non-conducting sheet
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Thought I Understood Gauss' Law (Sheets)
Replies
26
Views
2K
Determining electric field using gauss's law--different distributions
Replies
3
Views
1K
Surface Current and Electric Field
Replies
1
Views
2K
Gauss' law and the potential V (plane layer case)
Replies
7
Views
761
Direction of electric field vector on the surface of charged conductor
Replies
9
Views
1K
Gauss' law problem -- Should the field due to both the inside and outside charges be taken into account?
Replies
28
Views
1K
Electric field external to Conducting Hollow Sphere with charge inside
Replies
23
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top