Proving Non Singularity of Square Matrix is Necessary for Invertibility

[johncena]

Q:Prove that a square matrix A is invertible iff A is non singular.
My Ans: Since the inverse of a square matrix is given by,
A^ = (1/|A|)adj.A (Where A^ is A inverse)
If |A|=0, A^ is not defined.
i.e, A^ exist only if A is non singular. In other words, a square matrix A is invertible iff A is non singular.
Conversly, Let |A|=0, i.e., let A be singular.
then, A^=(1/|A|)adj.A = (1/0)adj.A (not defined)
Hence we conclude that A^ exist only if A is non singular.

I got only 1 out of 5 marks for this answer. What is missing in my answer?

 

[ohubrismine]

Q:Prove that a square matrix A is invertible iff A is non singular.
My Ans: Since the inverse of a square matrix is given by,
A^ = (1/|A|)adj.A (Where A^ is A inverse)
If |A|=0, A^ is not defined.
i.e, A^ exist only if A is non singular. In other words, a square matrix A is invertible iff A is non singular.
Conversly, Let |A|=0, i.e., let A be singular.
then, A^=(1/|A|)adj.A = (1/0)adj.A (not defined)
Hence we conclude that A^ exist only if A is non singular.

I got only 1 out of 5 marks for this answer. What is missing in my answer?

Let A be a square invertible matrix.
Then there exist a finite number of elementary operations on A that will transform A to I. That is, E1E2...EnA=I. Hence, there exists an inverse of A, namely E1E2...En. So A is nonsingular.
Thus, if A is invertible, then A is nonsingular.

Conversely, let A be nonsingular.
Then there exists an inverse of A.
Hence there exist a finite number of elementary operations on A such that A is transformed to I. That is A^-1 = E1E2...En and (A^-1)A=I. So A is invertible.
Thus, if A is nonsingular, then A is invertible.

Therefore, A is invertible iff A is nonsingular.

 

[johncena]

Why my answer is incorrect?

 

[ohubrismine]

Why my answer is incorrect?

Strictly speaking, "invertible" means that a matrix can be transformed into the identity matrix by a finite series of elementary operations. Your proof did not use the definition.

One problem with constructing the proof is that invertible and nonsigular are often used interchangeably. But this is precisely because of the bi-implication.

Are you taking linear algebra this summer or are you rehashing an old exam?

 

[CellCoree]

Your answer is technically correct, but it lacks explanation and elaboration. To improve your answer, you could provide more context and background information about the concepts of singularity and invertibility. Additionally, you could explain why the determinant (|A|) being equal to zero leads to the inverse not being defined. Lastly, you could provide an example to illustrate your point. Overall, adding more details and explanation would make your answer more comprehensive and earn you more marks.