Examining Density's Impact on Projectile Motion

AI Thread Summary
Density significantly impacts projectile motion, particularly through the concept of drag, which affects how objects like bottle rockets behave in the air. The density of the medium, such as air, influences the drag force experienced by the projectile, while the density of the projectile itself also plays a role. During the burn phase, the rocket accelerates, but once the fuel is depleted, it decelerates due to gravity and drag, leading to a less parabolic trajectory. Heavier objects are less affected by drag compared to lighter ones, which can cause them to "fizzle out" instead of maintaining a parabolic path. Ultimately, the design of the rocket, including its mass and shape, determines its motion in the atmosphere.
apiche
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm still new to the field of physics and have undertaken a project in furthering my understanding of projectile motion. Can density affect the parabolic shape of a projectile especially concerning the tail end of its motion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Density of the medium it's traveling in or density of the object? Density of the medium would definately affect it. This is called drag and it's why skydivers reach a terminal velocity. The center of gravity of an object follows normal projectile motion no matter what spin the object has. I have no idea what you mean by the tail end of it's motion.
 
Let me clarify. When launching bottle rockets, I've noticed that they typically start off strong and then have the tendency to "fizzle out" and almost float down to the ground instead of following a more parabolic motion. Does the density of the actual rocket affect that motion?
 
You are quite right. A projectile follows a curve that is sort of like the shape of a female breast. (I forget the technical name.) The amount of departure from parabolic depends upon the ratio of air density to projectile density. It also depends upon drag coefficient.
 
As the bottle rocket is in it's burn phase it's accelerating. As soon as the burn is over it slows down due to gravity. The reason why the bottle rocket doesn't follow a parabolic path on the way down is because it's pretty much an empty carboard tube and has major drag. If you were on the moon it would follow a parabolic path after the burn phase. I'm willing to bet if you fix some weights on the rocket it would follow that path as well. It was probably desiged like that anyway so rockets don't come back as deadly projectiles.


edit: forgot to say that the drag is directly proportional to the velocity and has mothing to do with the mass. so objects with more mass are unaffected by the miniscule drag where as less massive objects are greatly affected by it.
 
Last edited:
apiche said:
Let me clarify. When launching bottle rockets, I've noticed that they typically start off strong and then have the tendency to "fizzle out" and almost float down to the ground instead of following a more parabolic motion. Does the density of the actual rocket affect that motion?

A bottle rocket is not a projectile.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top