Example of a local field of positive characteristic?

zarei175
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a local field of positive characteristic, like Q22 was used in this article:
http://8pic.ir/images/s9oiiuqqkq989w3posu9.png
in fact, i need an another Example of a local field of positive characteristic like Q22 .
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    74.8 KB · Views: 479
zarei175 said:
I am looking for a local field of positive characteristic, like Q22 was used in this article:
http://8pic.ir/images/s9oiiuqqkq989w3posu9.png
in fact, i need an another Example of a local field of positive characteristic like Q22 .
No problem here. First of all, I think you have remarked that the field of p-adic numbers is of positive characteristic. To create a local field easily, you can take any integral ring (in your case, take a ring R of positive characteristic like the ring of polynomials over F_p), and then LOCALIZE this ring according to some prime ideal of R (in the previous example, take some prime ideal like the ideal of polynomials multiple of X, then the localization is the ring of polynomial fractions P1/P2 where P2 is not multiple of X).
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top