Example of only a single force occurence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter llamaboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Force
AI Thread Summary
It is indeed possible for an object to be acted upon by only a single force in a naturally occurring situation. An example provided is a satellite in orbit around the Earth, where the only force acting on it is gravity. In this case, the satellite experiences constant free-fall, resulting in the net force being equal to the gravitational force. This scenario illustrates a clear instance of a single force occurrence. Understanding these principles is essential in physics.
llamaboy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is this possible?

I have been struggling with the following question, which is an assignment from my physics professor. Any help would be wonderful, thank you...

Is it possible to have a naturally occurring situation where an object/element/particle is being acted upon by only a single force? i.e. the net Force on the object = the force of the single force.

I think it has to be a electromagnetically neutral particle that is being acted upon only by one instance of the gravitational force.

is this possible? What would be an example?

Thank you, Llamaboy :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
how about the Earth going around the sun?
 


Yes, it is possible to have a naturally occurring situation where an object is being acted upon by only a single force. One example of this is a satellite in orbit around the Earth. The only force acting on the satellite is the force of gravity from the Earth. This is because the satellite is in a state of constant free-fall, where the gravitational force is the only force acting on it. In this scenario, the net force on the satellite is equal to the force of gravity, making it an example of a single force occurrence.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top