Exhaustion Methods Explained: Sum of Areas of Outer & Inner Rectangles

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrewkg
  • Start date Start date
andrewkg
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Well if anyone has read Apostol's vol 1. Can anyone explain in the beginingthe sum of the areas of the outer rectangles is (b^3/n^3)(k^2) or
(b^3/n^3)(1^2+2^2+3^2…+n^2)

And the area of the inner rectangles and (b^3/n^3)(1^2+2^2+3^2…+(n-1)^2)

What I would like to know is why does the value of k for the inner area sum goes to n-1
Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Oh yeah. My idea was that the interior rectangles cannot have a value directly at b so the value of k must be under the of n so n doesn't cancek out. Although this woukd not occur anyways because the value of n on the bottom is n^3 and the value of k on tome is only squared. Honestly though I don't have a good idea. I tryed it graphically on my own paper I got lost with what I was doing.
 
You should know that
1^2+ 2^2+ 3^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ n^2= \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}

As to what happens to the "k", I doubt if anyone can answer because you have not said what "k" represents.
 
Nvm I got it. Thanks though
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top