Expansion of Fermat's Little Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter pacdude9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Theorem
pacdude9
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've got a pair of (related) problems that are keeping me stumped. The two problems they are asking me to prove are:

p^{(q-1)} + q^{(p - 1)} \equiv 1 \; (\!\!\!\!\!\! \mod \, pq)

a^{\phi(b)} + b^{\phi(a)} \equiv 1<br /> \; (\!\!\!\!\!\! \mod \, ab)

Where \phi(n) is Euler's Totient Function.

I know that these are similar, as the second problem is using Euler's Theorem, a generalization of Fermat's Little Theorem, I just can't seem to figure them out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show:
p^{q-1}+q^{p-1}\equiv 1 \pmod{p}
? If so can you do the same mod q and combine these results to get it mod pq?
 
BTW you are probably forgetting some requirements, because as stated your identities are false. Take for instance a=4, b=6, then you get:
\phi(a)=\phi(b)=2
a^{\phi(a)}+b^{\phi(b)}=4^2+6^2=52 \equiv 4 \pmod {ab=24}
Perhaps you meant for a and b to be relatively prime. And in the first you can take p=q=2 and get:
p^{q-1}+q^{p-1} = 2^1+2^1 = 4 \equiv 0 \pmod {pq=4}
Maybe p and q should be distinct?
 
rasmhop said:
Perhaps you meant for a and b to be relatively prime.
Maybe p and q should be distinct?

Thanks! Yes, in the first one, p and q are distinct primes, and in the second, a and b are coprime.
 
Indeed, Euler's Totient Function is a very nice generalization of Fermat's Little Theorem. There is an intuitive proof for both which is studied in "Olympiad Training" but if you're a student, you may try to use group properties. (hint- consider the set {1,2,...,p-1} and the multiplication modulo p. This is clearly a group. Then, What is the order of this group ? What is the order of each element? What does Lagrange's theorem implies ? Try first with Fermat's Little Theorem, and then you may try to expand in Euler's function)
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top