Expectation value of a finite well, and superposition of first two states.

[solas99]

Homework Statement

the first two energy eigenstates of a 1 nm wide finite well of barrier height 8v_o have energy eigen values of 0.66ε and 2.6ε. calculate the expectation value of a linear superposition of these states?

Homework Equations

airy equations

The Attempt at a Solution

i have attached a photo with working out..

would appreciate any help

 

[Simon Bridge]

I was expecting something along the lines of \langle H \rangle = c_1^2E_1 + c_2^2E_2 where c_n = \int \psi_n^\star \psi d\tau ... are you not given the superposition?

But then I realized that while you said you had to find the "expectation value of the superposition" you did not say which property you needed the expectation value of ... with retrospect, the expectation value of energy would seem to be too simple. Even so - you seem to have been intent on calculating a value for energy.

Anyway - I think your reasoning needs to be more explicit in order to be able to advise you.
eg - in the first line you seem to want to calculate E_2-E_1 but you don't say what this is supposed to achieve ... you also have an expression for E_n being equal to an expression for a difference in energies... which seems to me to be flat wrong.

You have a notation: "@2=0" ... or is it "@z=0" ? (if so - good habit: cross your "z"'s).
You then spend a lot of time rearranging an equation.

 

[solas99]

I was expecting something along the lines of \langle H \rangle = c_1^2E_1 + c_2^2E_2 where c_n = \int \psi_n^\star \psi d\tau ... are you not given the superposition?
nope, not given the superposition
But then I realized that while you said you had to find the "expectation value of the superposition" you did not say which property you needed the expectation value of ... with retrospect, the expectation value of energy would seem to be too simple. Even so - you seem to have been intent on calculating a value for energy.

i want to calculate the energy expectation value of a linear superposition of these states.

Anyway - I think your reasoning needs to be more explicit in order to be able to advise you.
eg - in the first line you seem to want to calculate E_2-E_1 but you don't say what this is supposed to achieve ... you also have an expression for E_n being equal to an expression for a difference in energies... which seems to me to be flat wrong.

i tried to calculate the superposition energy of 1st two states then add that to E in airy function

You have a notation: "@2=0" ... or is it "@z=0" ? (if so - good habit: cross your "z"'s).
You then spend a lot of time rearranging an equation.

the notation is (@z=0) or "z"=0.

 

[solas99]

the expression for E_n should be just E then.

so now i can calculate a value of E for a 1nm wide finite well in superposition of the 1st two states where (n₂²-n₁²)..

with that plugged in and calculated i get a value of 1.793e-19 J

does this value come into the airy function to help resolve the energy expectation value of linear superposition of the states given.(0.66 and 2.6ε)

 

[solas99]

my other question is: does the barrier height of 8v₀ have an effect(should it be included somewhere in the equation).

im greatly thankful for your help :)

 

[Simon Bridge]

the expression for E_n should be just E then.

The first E_n seems fine ... it's just that the rest of the line makes no sense mathematically - you have unequal things being equal: a contradiction! You need to get rid of at least one of those equals signs.

Also the E₂-E₁ bits would just give the transition energy between states 1 and 2. How is this related to the expectation value?

so now i can calculate a value of E for a 1nm wide finite well in superposition of the 1st two states where (n₂²-n₁²)..

Just to be clear - you are told that the particle is in the superposition of the 1st two energy eigenstates?

nope, not given the superposition

? then why do the calculation for the first two eigenstates then?

i tried to calculate the superposition energy of 1st two states then add that to E in airy function

... why? How does that get you the expectation value?

does this value [8V₀] come into the airy function to help resolve the energy expectation value of linear superposition of the states given.(0.66 and 2.6ε)

The barrier height would certainly affect the Airy function - it goes into the V(z) part of the Schodinger equation.

I think one of us is horribly confused.

You have a state ψ(z) prepared in a superposition of energy eigenstates thus \psi=c_a\psi_a + c_b\psi_b with eigenvalues E_a=0.66ε and E_b=2.6ε

If you know the Schodinger equation solutions for the energy eigenstates for your shape well then you should be able to just put these E values into get the wave-functions. But I am unclear about the exact shape of the potential ... please write out the potential function for me: V(z)= ... and I don't see what V₀ and ε are supposed to be.

The expectation value of energy is:\langle H \rangle = \int_0^\infty \psi^\star H \psi dzIt gives the average energy of the particle in the state ψ ... if the two eigenstates were equally likely then this is just \bar{E}=\frac{1}{2}(E_a+E_b), but that may not be the case, which is why the probability amplitudes are needed.

 

[solas99]

the question reads:

the first two energy eigenstates of a 1nm wide finite well of barrier 8v_o have energy eigenvalues of 0.66ε and 2.6ε, where the symbols have their usual meaning. calculate the energy expectation value of a linear superposition of these states.

 

[solas99]

im very confused now :S

how would u tackle such question, what are the important equations required, and what assumptions do we make to solve it.

 

[solas99]

im thinking to ignore the 1st equation i have written down, and start 1st with airy function (@z=0), get a value for that, which will look like (-2.48e-19ε_i)..

then take that value and multiply it by the the values of 0.66ε and 2.6ε,
this will then give me the expectation value for
E1=-2.48e-19(0.66)=-1.6368e-19 j
and E2=-2.48e-19(2.6)= -6.448e-19 j

is that right?

or just E=(n²hbar²π2)/(2mlz²)

lz=1nm
so i get a value for E. which is 1.793e-19 j

take that value of E, substitute it into the Airy function equation, and solve for E ( two different E's in the Airy function).

im then left with E=(number)ε_i

then take that value and multiply it by the the values of 0.66ε and 2.6ε,
this will then give me the expectation value for
E1=-2.48e-19(0.66)=-1.6368e-19 j
and E2=-2.48e-19(2.6)= -6.448e-19 j

 

[Oxvillian]

Hi solas99

I'm confused here as to exactly what type of potential well we have here - is it the (infinite) linear well with the nasty Airy functions at the top of your page, or is it a finite square well, or is it a finite square well with a barrier?

In any case, if you know ε, and you know what linear superposition of energy eigenstates you have, then it's dead easy to find the energy expectation value - see Simon Bridge's first reply.

 

[solas99]

that is exactly how the question is given:
the first two energy eigenstates of a 1nm wide FINITE well of barrier 8vo have energy eigenvalues of 0.66ε and 2.6ε, where the symbols have their usual meaning. calculate the energy expectation value of a linear superposition of these states.

im as confused, on what should i apply to solve it.

no other information is given, except for this.

thanks again for replying

 

[Oxvillian]

Maybe it's just a plain old finite square well then? So no Airy functions?

 

[Simon Bridge]

Maybe it's just a plain old finite square well then? So no Airy functions?

... I'm leaning in that direction - but it is looking more and more like it does not actually matter and "linear superposition" will mean an equal mix of the two states and the question just wants to know if the reader understands what "expectation" means.

@solas99: the question is leaving a lot to context ... do you know what "the usual meanings" for V₀ and ε are? You've got the book, not me - they must tell you! Similarly look for what they usually mean by "linear superposition".

What does "barrier" and "finite well" mean, according to the book.
There are many possible finite wells and many possible barriers that could fit that description. Is there any special reason you chose the triangle well?Off your efforts I was imagining a potential that looked like:

V(z)=8V₀ : z < 0 (V₀ := well depth)
V(z)=(z-w)V₀/w : 0≤z<w (w := width of the well)
V(z)=0 : z≥w
... but I see that you are clearly told you have the first two energy states and I somehow doubt this configuration will give those energies. From your reading of the chapter and the related questions, how would you write out the potential?

But, like Oxvillian says, if you know ε, then you don't need to know the exact potential, and the calculation becomes trivial.