Is the Expectation Value of Momentum Always Zero in Time-Independent States?

Johny18
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Good Evening Fellows,
I have the following question,
So far I have learned that the expectation value of momentum is equal the time derivative of the expectation value of position. If the potential only depends upon position and not on time. Then, if we use the time independent schrodinger equation the wavefuntion will be separable into a purely function of x and a function of t. Therefore, is it correct to assert that the expectation value of momentum will always be zero for this case, since the expectation value of position will be a constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the stationary states (energy eigenstates) that you get by solving the time-independent SE, this is true.

However, it is not true for states that are superpositions of energy eigenstates. Consider for example a superposition of the first two energy eigenstates of the "particle in a box:"

$$\Psi(x,t) = a_1 \psi_1(x)e^{-iE_1 t / \hbar} + a_2 \psi_2(x)e^{-iE_2 t / \hbar}$$

For this wavefunction, the expectation values of position and momentum are not constant.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top