Expectation values of harmonic oscillator in general state

Jomenvisst
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So, this has been bothering me for a while.

Lets say we have the wavefunction of a harmonic oscillator as a general superposition of energy eigenstates:

\Psi = \sum c_{n} \psi _{n} exp(i(E_{n}-E_{m})t/h)

Is it true in this case that <V> =(1/2) <E> .

I tried calculating this but i get something like

<V> = < \Psi |V| \Psi > = (1/2)<E> + some other term that does not seem to be zero generally.

However, it seems to me that <V> =(1/2) <E> should be true even in this case, since
&lt;V&gt;_{n} = &lt;\psi_{n} | V | \psi_{n} &gt; = (1/2) &lt;E&gt; for every n.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The superposition state is no longer stationary. The derivation of the virial theorem (Davydov, Sect 17 from Chapter II) will not be valid.
 
Thank you for the answer.

I agree with that, but that doesn't necessarily mean that <V>(t) != (1/2) <E>. I still feel the equality should hold.
 
To see that it shouldn't hold, imagine taking the ground state and translating it very far from the minimum of the potential. This doesn't change the kinetic energy, but makes the potential energy very large. Clearly, <V> no longer equals (1/2)<E>.

This comes from the fact that when you compute <V> in your superposition of energy eigenstates, you will get a bunch of cross terms between the energy eigenstates that spoil the relation <V> = (1/2)<E>
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top