Expectation values of harmonic oscillator in general state

Jomenvisst
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So, this has been bothering me for a while.

Lets say we have the wavefunction of a harmonic oscillator as a general superposition of energy eigenstates:

\Psi = \sum c_{n} \psi _{n} exp(i(E_{n}-E_{m})t/h)

Is it true in this case that <V> =(1/2) <E> .

I tried calculating this but i get something like

<V> = < \Psi |V| \Psi > = (1/2)<E> + some other term that does not seem to be zero generally.

However, it seems to me that <V> =(1/2) <E> should be true even in this case, since
&lt;V&gt;_{n} = &lt;\psi_{n} | V | \psi_{n} &gt; = (1/2) &lt;E&gt; for every n.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The superposition state is no longer stationary. The derivation of the virial theorem (Davydov, Sect 17 from Chapter II) will not be valid.
 
Thank you for the answer.

I agree with that, but that doesn't necessarily mean that <V>(t) != (1/2) <E>. I still feel the equality should hold.
 
To see that it shouldn't hold, imagine taking the ground state and translating it very far from the minimum of the potential. This doesn't change the kinetic energy, but makes the potential energy very large. Clearly, <V> no longer equals (1/2)<E>.

This comes from the fact that when you compute <V> in your superposition of energy eigenstates, you will get a bunch of cross terms between the energy eigenstates that spoil the relation <V> = (1/2)<E>
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top