Expected Lifetime of Watches with Pareto Distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter BrownianMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifetime
BrownianMan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
For watches produced by a certain manufacturer, lifetimes follow a single-parameter Pareto distribution with alpha > 1 and theta = 4. The expected lifetime of a watch is 8 years.

a) Calculate the probability that the lifetime of a watch is at least 6 years.
b) For the same distribution as above, calculate the expected life of a watch that has already survived 6 years.

I did part a) and got the right answer: 0.444.

Not sure about part b). Wouldn't the answer be 8 years?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BrownianMan said:
For watches produced by a certain manufacturer, lifetimes follow a single-parameter Pareto distribution with alpha > 1 and theta = 4. The expected lifetime of a watch is 8 years.

a) Calculate the probability that the lifetime of a watch is at least 6 years.
b) For the same distribution as above, calculate the expected life of a watch that has already survived 6 years.

I did part a) and got the right answer: 0.444.

Not sure about part b). Wouldn't the answer be 8 years?

Different articles on Pareto distributions use different names for the parameters, so it is not clear what you mean by α and θ. Please describe in more detail, or give a formula for the density function, or something similar.

For (b): the lifetime L = 6+R, where R = remaining life: ER is calculated using the conditional density ##f_X(x| X \geq 6).##
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top