Experiment: Gradient Colored Rod in Special Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter yinfudan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Rod
yinfudan
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
The length contraction in special relativity says that a rod moving along its axis will appear shorter by γ to a stationary observer. I think, however, not only the rod will appear shorter, but also each small segment of the rod will show its snapshot of different time as in the moving frame, in other words, the observer see part of rod in its current snapshot, but part of the rod in its past snapshot.

Am I correct? In order to make myself clearer, I come up with this experiment. Could you please tell me if it is valid or if there is any flaw. Thanks!

In a standard configuration, which frame O' is moving along the x-axis of frame O with speed v, clock is synchronized to 0 when origin O' coincides origin O. Also, let us use normalized scale. The unit of time t is second; the unit of x-axis x is light-second; and thus the velocity v = x/t is the ratio of speed with the light speed, 0<=v<1, γ=1 / sqrt(1-v2)

In frame O', there is a rod with length L', resting between x'=0 to x'=L'. The entire rod can change color uniformly with time. For example, the rod's color is blue at time t'=-L'*v but changes to red at time t'=0.

So for a stationary observer in frame O, at time t=0, he will see the rod's length to be L=L'/γ. That is not all. He will also see the rod's left end is red color, but the right end is blue color, and the color changes from red to blue gradually on the rod body.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right. This is easy to see if you draw a spacetime diagram.
 
Yes, this is another consequence of the relativity of simultaneity. If you have two clocks attached to either end of the rod which are synchronized in the rod's rest frame, then assuming the rod is changing color uniformly in its own rest frame, snapshots of the two clocks showing the same time will always show that the color of the section of the rod next to them is the same too. Because of the relativity of simultaneity, in the frame where the rod is moving the two clocks show different times at any given moment, so at any given moment the section of the rod next to each clock must be a different color (since all frames must agree on local facts about the color of the section of the rod next to the clock when the clock is showing a specific time).
 
Thanks Fredrik and Jesse!

Another quick question: Due to length contract, the volume of the rod also decreases. Will the mass density of the rod increase for the observer?
 
yinfudan said:
Thanks Fredrik and Jesse!

Another quick question: Due to length contract, the volume of the rod also decreases. Will the mass density of the rod increase for the observer?
If you define "mass density" as rest mass/volume then yes. It's possible there could be other ways of defining density in relativity (for instance, one might define it in terms of relativistic mass instead of rest mass, although this would still result in the density being higher in the frame where the object is moving), I'm not really sure.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top