I Experimental Data - Error in slope

raniero
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I have conducted a tensile test on five specimens. I intend to do a linear regression for every set of data and get a value for the slope (modulus of elasticity) and its error by finding the standard deviation (using LINEST function on excel) of the slope.

I will now end up with 5 slope values and 5 errors. I will then find the average of 5 slopes, but, how can I find the 'average' of the 5 errors to finally obtain one value for the modulus of elasticity and one error?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
Google weighted average. For the error you have this

Thanks for your reply. Is this method to combine uncertainties typically used in science experiments ?
 
You could do some kind of weighted average, but if you think the slopes are related in such a way that the ""average slope" makes sense, then this really calls for some kind of multilevel model. I recommend looking up (or finding someone in your department familiar with) mixed-effect model.
 
raniero said:
Thanks for your reply. Is this method to combine uncertainties typically used in science experiments ?
Yes. But Number9 has a good point. If your experiments are comparable and your specimens are unsuspect (*), there is no good reason to assume the errors should come out significantly different. Some judgement comes in. Mechanically following the algorithms may not be the best way to go (*) suppose one test strip has a mechanical defect or a slightly different composition -- that would produce an outlier and you simple want to ignore that and average the others - maybe even without weighting.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top