Experimental dispersion relation of phonons

exciton
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I don't understand how one would exactly determine a dispersion relation
of phonons experimentally.

There are two equations, one for momentum and one for energy conservation:

\vec{k} - \vec{k^{'}} = \vec{G} + \vec{K}


\omega - \omega ^{'} = \omega(K)

where \omega(K) is the energy difference of the scattered neutrons,
\vec{k}, \vec{k^{'}} are the wave vectors of the neutrons before and
after scattering, \vec{K} is the created phonon and \vec{G} a
reciprocal lattice vector.

The question is, how is the difference \vec{k} - \vec{k^{'}} respectively \vec{K} determined experimentally?

Of course I also have to know \vec{G}.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't. Phonons simply do not have momentum, but *lattice*-momentum, which is lives on a torus (or some other compact manifold) rather than a plane. This is because the underlying crystal violates translational symmetry, reducing it to a discrete one. Similarly, electrons in crystals only have lattice momentum.

But, you will say, what about when I shoot something into it? Outside, it's got definite momentum, but inside it doesn't?

Answer: Yep. It's momentum will get broken into two components, one that lies in the Brillouin zone, and a component that is a multiple of the reciprocal lattice vector. The latter is transferred to the entire crystal as a whole. Upon emission, the opposite happens, one component from within the Brillouin zone is added to a crystal momentum to give the exiting particle its true momentum.

So when determining the dispersion of phonons, one would shoot in some neutrons, and observe the change of (true) momentum. This curve should repeat after translation by one reciprocal lattice vector, from which the zone can be determined. Then folding the curve back on itself gives the desired relationship.
 
Hi genneth,

thanks for your (very good) explanation. It helps a lot.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top