Experimental status of stellar structure

AI Thread Summary
Experimental determination of conditions inside stars, such as temperature and pressure variations, is limited. While direct measurements are not feasible, models based on fundamental physics allow predictions about stellar internal structures. For instance, knowing the Sun's mass and radius helps predict its core temperature, which is essential for hydrogen fusion. The detection of neutrinos on Earth provides evidence that the Sun is indeed fusing hydrogen, supporting these models. Overall, experimental observations and theoretical models work together to enhance our understanding of stellar processes.
muppet
Messages
602
Reaction score
1
A naive question from someone who knows nothing about the subject:

I was wondering how much we can tell experimentally about what's going on inside a star. Can we determine, say, how the temperature or pressure vary as a function of the radius?

Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not purely by experiments, no. But we know a great deal about the basics of physics and can build models that predict what the internal structure should be like. We can then take our observations from experiments we CAN do and compare them to predictions by our models. If they match, then we take that to mean our models are accurate.
 
Thanks for your reply. Can I ask you to elaborate about what we can predict and test, based on such models?
 
Sure. For example, we know how pressure and heat builds as you compress a gas. Knowing the mass of the Sun and the radius we can predict what the temperature inside the Sun should be. If our prediction is accurate, the core should approach a temperature that allows it to fuse protons together to form helium. So how do we know that the Sun is fusing hydrogen? Well, one way is that we know the fusion process releases particles known as neutrinos. Neutrinos don't interact very well with matter and can pass through the Sun very easily. We have detectors here on Earth that have detected a small portion of these neutrinos, giving us evidence that the Sun is indeed fusing hydrogen in its core.

Does that make sense?
 
Sure, thanks. [Just to clarify, I know a bit about general physics, just not astrophysics! My undergrad degree was in maths and physics, so astrophysics was the sort of thing that had to make way for the maths...]
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top