Explain solution to me(Gravitation)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gavroy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the gravitational dynamics of the Moon if its rotation around the Earth were to stop. The initial problem involves calculating how long it would take for the Moon to crash into the Earth, given its initial distance and zero velocity. The solution involves applying Kepler's third law, but there is confusion regarding the use of r/2 in the calculations. It is clarified that as the Moon's velocity approaches zero, its orbit becomes more elliptical, leading to a semi-major axis of r/2. The correct time for the Moon to fall to Earth is determined to be T=√2/8t, not T=√2/4t.
Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
first thing, that you might want to know is, that i am not from an english-speaking country, so please, excuse my grammar...;-)

Homework Statement


hi

i have a problem here and i already know the solution, but the thing is, that i do not understand it.

let's see:
the first question was: the moon rotates around the Earth and now some evil person stops the rotation. so the moon is still that far away from the Earth as he was before but now his velocity is 0.

The question now was: how long does it take until the moon crashes into the earth?

And the solution was, that you use kepler's third law and set: T²/(r/2)³=t²/r³

i should explain that " t " is the time the moon would ordinarily need to go one time around the Earth and r is the distance between the Earth and the moon

and T/2 is the solution. That seems okay to me, because you only want to know how much time it takes to go one way to the Earth and not back again. but why do they set r/2 in the denominator?

i always thought that there you should use the aphelion, which is the farthest distance between the central object and the traveling object. but in this case, the starting position should be the farthest position, as the moon would not go farther from the Earth than this initial distance, or am i wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your friend is wrong. There's a missing term in his solution.

First, look at T²/(r/2)³=t²/r³. The solution to this is T²=t²/8, or T=t/(2√2)=(√2/4)t.

That is the period of an orbit with a semi-major axis half that of the Moon's semi-major axis. One way to look at this is to imagine what happens in the limit as the Moon's velocity approaches zero. As the Moon's velocity decreases, the Moon's orbit would become more eliptical, with perigee approaching zero in the limit v→0. Since the semi-major axis is the average of perigee and apogee, this means that the semi-major axis would approach r/2 as v→0. Hence the r/2.

However, T=\frac{\sqrt 2}4t is the period of this limiting orbit. This is not the quantity to be solved for. The question asks how long it would take for the Moon to fall. Going from apogee to perigee is half of an orbit, so the correct solution is
T=\frac{\sqrt 2}{8}t
 
wow, thank you...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top