A Explaining Chaos in Constant Accelerating Systems

AI Thread Summary
Chaos can emerge in systems with nonlinearity, but in a constant accelerating system described by the equation s(t)=v_0t+(at^2)/2, chaos does not occur despite its nonlinear form. This is primarily because the system is not sensitive to initial conditions, which is a key factor in chaos theory. The largest Lyapunov exponent calculation yields zero, indicating stability rather than chaos. Additionally, the constant force in the system leads to a linear equation of motion, making it fundamentally different from systems that exhibit chaotic behavior. Thus, the distinction between the nature of the differential equation and the system's sensitivity to initial conditions is crucial in understanding the absence of chaos in this context.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Chaos could appear in the system if there is some nonlinearity. My question is how to explain that there is no chaos in constant acceletating system
s(t)=v_0t+\frac{at^2}{2}
when equation is nonlinear? Why is important only that difference and differential equation be nonlinear. It confusing me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:
Chaos could appear in the system if there is some nonlinearity. My question is how to explain that there is no chaos in constant acceletating system
s(t)=v_0t+\frac{at^2}{2}
when equation is nonlinear? Why is important only that difference and differential equation be nonlinear. It confusing me.
The crucial point is probably, that ##s(t)## isn't sensitive on the initial conditions. To answer why, I'll have to ask you which definition of sensitivity do you want to use (I've found three on Wikipedia). I assume the entire trajectory will be the underlying topological space as well as its dense ##s-##invariant subset in order to clear the topological assumptions.
 
  • Like
Likes robertisakov
Exponential sensitivity. Calculation of largest Lyapunov exponent.
 
A back of the envelope calculation with the first differential as quotient of rates, the formula ##\log (1+t) = - \log (1 - (\frac{t}{1+t}))## and the power series of ##\log## gave me a Lyapunov exponent zero.
 
An anharmonic 1D oscillator with Lagrangian ##\frac{p^2}{2m}-kx^4## isn't chaotic either, even though the equation of motion is nonlinear in ##x(t)##. On the other hand, you can make a harmonic oscillator chaotically sensitive to the initial condition by choosing a negative "spring constant" (a slightest deviation from the equilibrium position will start growing exponentially) . Note that in the constant accelerating system the force is an s-independent constant, which means that it's actually a mechanical system with a linear equation of motion even though the trajectory is a nonlinear function of ##t##.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top