Explaining Protons: A Positive Charge & Its Real-World Applications

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
16 replies · 3K views
Crazyhorse2882
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I've just recently learned that protons do in fact have a charge, I was wondering if someone could explain this, as far as applying a positive charge, some real world examples. I've always studied current as a flow of electrons, never heard of a flow of protons before and have no idea what it would be used for. Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That's because protons are fairly big, compared to electrons, and are usually confined to the nuclei of atoms (together with the neutrons that make up the nuclei). Electrons, in the "classical" picture, kind of whizz around the nucleus in a relatively big cloud, and it's easy to "knock" them off. Separating the particles that make up the nucleus usually takes more effort. Usually, positive "particles" are not protons, but complete nuclei of atoms with one or more electrons missing*. These "stripped" atoms are called ions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion).

* The exception is the hydrogen atom, which only consists of one proton and one electron, so if you strip the electron you automatically are left with just a proton.
 
Crazyhorse2882 said:
I've always studied current as a flow of electrons, never heard of a flow of protons before and have no idea what it would be used for. Thanks
Actually, in an Intrinsic Semiconductor, both electrons and the holes (absent of electron) contribute to the current.

intrin2.gif
 
Crazyhorse2882 said:
II've always studied current as a flow of electrons

Actually, electric current is usually not just "a flow of electrons", except in metals.

You might want to "unlearn" some more misconceptions about electricity from here: http://amasci.com/miscon/elect.html

dlgoff said:
Actually, in an Intrinsic Semiconductor, both electrons and the holes (absent of electron) contribute to the current.

True, but "holes" don't conduct electricity because of the movement of protons.
 
AlephZero said:
True, but "holes" don't conduct electricity because of the movement of protons.
True but the OPs thread title is Positive charge. I figured a little extra knowledge would be good.
 
dlgoff said:
True but the OPs thread title is Positive charge. I figured a little extra knowledge would be good.

Whilst they can be considered as 'existing' holes are a very sophisticated concept and will tend to add confusion to someone who clearly regards the motion of the electrons in a wire as a consideration in electrical theory.

Electrons, 'carrying' the charge through a metal go, on average, very slowly (1mm/s or so) and their mass is tiny so their kinetic energy is completely negligible - so that particular model is really not helpful. Little bullets shooting along a wire are not the way to look at this stuff.
 
Sophie I feel like you're being a bit condescending and I'm just trying to learn. That's why I asked the question
 
Crazyhorse2882 said:
Sophie I feel like you're being a bit condescending and I'm just trying to learn. That's why I asked the question

Apologies if that's how you see my response. My point is that, trying to view 'electricity' just in terms of electrons moving around in a conductor gets you nowhere fast. Electrons, in the environment of a condensed medium like a metal, do not behave as water or marbles (i.e. 'mechanically') They are, essentially, quantum particlesin those conditions. Yes they do behave as though they 'drift around', according to the Electric Fields but it's almost irrelevant when trying to predict the behaviour of a conductor in a circuit. It's no surprise that you won't find that model pursued in circuit theory texts because it doesn't really take you much further in understanding the topic.
If you want to see electricity in your own, personal way then that's your choice but you will almost certainly be better off in the long run if you take the 'conventional' approach and then, later on, see where the electron motion thing comes in. I guess what I'm saying is that there is no answer to the "what's real happening" question. That goes for all Science, when you get down to it, actually. Some models just work better than others when you want to progress in Science knowledge.
If you are trying to learn then it could be an idea not to be too committed to any particular personal approach. The majority of scientists didn't go down one particular road just through whimsy. It's just more fruitful, in the long run.
 
Crazyhorse2882 said:
I've just recently learned that protons do in fact have a charge, I was wondering if someone could explain this, as far as applying a positive charge, some real world examples. I've always studied current as a flow of electrons, never heard of a flow of protons before and have no idea what it would be used for. Thanks

"Negative charge" and "positive charge" are are an abundance or lack of electrons, or represent the direction of flow of electric current. They don't necessarily refer to movement of protons, unless its ions in solution etc.
 
Devils said:
"Negative charge" and "positive charge" are are an abundance or lack of electrons, or represent the direction of flow of electric current. They don't necessarily refer to movement of protons, unless its ions in solution etc.

Charge is more fundamental than that, although your view is good enough for everyday life. The electron is not the only charged fundamental particle. For example, quarks carry a charge which is e/3.
 
When they dope the semiconductors in transistors, is that a form of chemical reaction?
 
Last edited:
Crazyhorse2882 said:
When they dope the semiconductors in transistors, is that a form of chemical reaction?
I'm glad to see that you are asking this question and willing to delve deeper into the physics of the Solid State. The whole point of my original post was not to confuse you about charge but to, as sophiecentaur has pointed out, show there is more to this than

...trying to view 'electricity' just in terms of electrons moving around in a conductor...

I'm no expert in condensed matter physics but you may be some day. :thumbs:
 
Crazyhorse2882 said:
When they dope the semiconductors in transistors, is that a form of chemical reaction?

'Chemistry' is what is used when they actually do the doping but I don't know whether the definition of a 'reaction' is strictly 'producing a new substance' or not. The etymology is hardly relevant here. Whilst a semiconductor is actually operating, I would not say there is a reaction taking place. Nor is there any movement of positively charged real particles. The 'shuffling' of electrons from one positive site to another can be very much like a positive particle moving about in the semiconductor - which is where the notion of holes comes in. You can treat holes in many ways like positive charges moving around but this much be treated with care and no positive charges flow into the terminals of a semiconductor device from the connecting wires!
 
Doping semicon is a fundamental process for creating a material - it would be at the intersection ( basic levels ) of physics, material science, chemistry and, electrical theory. As such would will find specialists in each filed equally able to work in this filed. Since the devices created - are primarilty used in electrical engineering - the general field of study is in EE .
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Understanding the Coriolis Force and its Real-World Applications
  • Reshma
  • · Replies 12 ·
  • Mechanics
Replies
12
Graduate Explaining Physics: Tips & Real-World Applications
  • Xannax
  • · Replies 2 ·
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2