Explaining Synchrotron Radiation in Electron's Frame

mikejfe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi. As an "I'm bored Saturday afternoon exercise" I have been working out some stuff regarding bending magnets on linacs. This question came to me while thinking about particle energy losses inside the bending magnet.

Imagine an electron moving in a synchrotron with constant speed, radius and frequency, in the synchrotron's frame. An observer, in the synchrotron's frame, sees the electron with the aforementioned characteristics. The observer notes the electron is emitting x-rays. In the electron's frame, the synchrotron is rotating. Neglect gravity.

Loosely speaking, the observer justifies the x-ray emission by saying the electron is accelerating.

In the electron's frame how does the electron justify it's emission of x-rays?

I know I must be thinking about something incorrectly. This goes beyond the scope of the GR class I took during undergrad, or at least beyond the scope of what I can remember :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Acceleration is not relative.
 
Yes, as cesiumfrog points out, acceleration is not relative; the reference frame of the electron is not inertial and any observer moving with the electron would agree that it is an accelerated frame of reference, hence the emission of x-rays (at least while it interacts with the magnetic field).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top