Explaining the Physics of a Rolling Cannon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains the physics behind a rolling cannon firing a cannonball, emphasizing the law of conservation of momentum. When the cannonball is fired, both the cannon and the cannonball have equal magnitudes of momentum but in opposite directions. The cannonball's smaller mass allows it to achieve a higher velocity compared to the cannon's larger mass, resulting in a modest recoil. It is clarified that while the momenta are equal in magnitude, they are not equal as vectors due to their opposite directions. This illustrates the relationship between mass and velocity in momentum conservation.
eraemia
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Imagine a cannon that is free to roll on wheels. Initially, both the cannon and cannonball are at rest. When the cannonball is fired, though, the momentum transferred to the cannonball comes at the expense of the cannon, so the cannonball and cannon end up with momenta having equal magnitudes but opposite directions. If this is so, why does the cannonball fly away at a large speed while the cannon recoils only very modestly? Explain your response.

Homework Equations



Law of Conservation of Momentum
Newton's Third Law

The Attempt at a Solution



According to the law of conservation of momentum, the momentum of the canon would equal the momentum of the canonball. Since momentum is mv, the cannon's large mass would account for its smaller velocity/recoil, compared with the canonball's smaller mass and greater velocity. Is this right? What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you're missing anything. Your answer is correct. Except that where you said "the momentum of the canon would equal the momentum of the canonball" you should take care to note that they are in opposite direction and so momentum (a vector) is not equal, but only equal in magnitude.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top