Explaining the Science Behind Boiling Water with Ice | Homework Solution

AI Thread Summary
When the teacher boiled water in a stoppered flask and then inverted it with ice, the steam inside cooled rapidly upon contact with the cooler flask, causing condensation. This condensation reduced the amount of steam, leading to a drop in pressure within the flask. According to Boyle’s Law, the decrease in pressure allowed the water to boil at a lower temperature than normal. The phenomenon illustrates how boiling point is affected by vapor pressure. Understanding rapid evaporation is key, as it relates to how quickly a liquid can change to gas under varying pressure conditions.
ahhppull
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to explain what happened here...

My teacher boiled water in a flask using a bunsen burner. Then he stoppered the flask and turned it upside down and boiled the water using ice.

Homework Equations



• Boyle’s Law is the principle that at a constant temperature the volume of a confined ideal gas varies inversely with its pressure.
• Boiling - A liquid boils at a temperature at which its vapor pressure is equal to the pressure of the gas above it. The lower the pressure of a gas above a liquid, the lower the temperature at which the liquid will boil.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I looked it up, and I don't quite understand it. Heres a website that explained it (http://www.Newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem00/chem00894.htm). What I don't get is why the pressure dropped inside the flask?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My teacher also said we needed to know what rapid evaporation was. I looked it up online, but couldn't find any clear explanations on it, so if any of you guys know, please explain it =D
 
The pressure dropped in the flask because the steam in the stoppered flask cooled. Turning the flask upside-down brought the steam into contact with the cooler part of the flask. As the steam cooled, water condensed from it leaving the remaining air in the flask at lower pressure. This enables the water to boil at a lower temperature.

That's my explanation...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top