Explaining the Speed Limit: Energy & Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter DR13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the misconception about kinetic energy and the speed of light, c. The kinetic energy equation K=0.5mv^2 is only valid for velocities much smaller than c, while the correct relativistic kinetic energy formula is more complex. Total energy must also be adjusted for relativistic speeds, leading to the conclusion that as velocity approaches c, both energy and kinetic energy approach infinity. For massless particles, different equations involving momentum are applicable, allowing calculations even as mass approaches zero. Understanding these principles resolves the confusion regarding the speed limit set by c.
DR13
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Please tell me why I am wrong here. I know I am, I just want to know why.

K=.5mv^2
E=mc^2
So if all of the energy is kinetic then
mc^2=.5mv^2
Solving for v
v=sqrt(2)*c

However, the "speed limit" is c. How would this be explained? My guess is that the equation for K does not apply here for some reason but I don't really have a clue.

Thanks for the help,
DR13
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E=mc^2 is the energy of a mass at rest, so v=0 in your first equation.
 
Your equation for kinetic energy is not quite correct. It only works for values of v that are very small compared to c. The correct equation is quite a bit more complicated.

KE = \left(\sqrt{\frac{c^2}{c^2-v^2}} - 1\right)mc^2

For small values of v, the following approximation works.

\sqrt{\frac{c^2}{c^2-v^2}} \approx 1 + \frac{1}{2}\frac{v^2}{c^2}

If you substitute this into the above, you get kinetic energy equation that you are familiar with.

The total energy also needs to be corrected. As Dale points out, your equation only works for v=0. In general, total energy is given by this formula.

E = \sqrt{\frac{c^2}{c^2-v^2}}mc^2

Now, if you set this energy to be equal to KE, you'll find that the only solution is v infinitely close to c. (v=c causes you to divide by zero, but you can get arbitrarily close.) However, this also makes E and KE go to infinity.

The way this works out for real particles is that mass is zero. That, unfortunately, makes above equations undefined. So there is yet another set of equations you can use.

E^2 = p^2c^2 + m^2c^4

KE = E - mc^2

Here, p is momentum. For a particle with m>0, momentum is given by the following.

p=\sqrt{\frac{c^2}{c^2-v^2}mv

If you substitute this in, you'll get exactly the same equations for kinetic and total energy as before. The added benefit is that you can use the equations with momentum even when m=0. Then.

E = pc

KE = pc - mc^2 = pc

This is exactly what you have been looking for.

Yes, that's a lot of equations, but you really only need to know the one giving E in terms of p. All of the other equations can be derived from it.
 
Oh ok. Now I get it. Thanks guys!
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top