Explaining Time Homogeneous Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Conservation

AI Thread Summary
If the Lagrangian is time-homogeneous, the Hamiltonian is indeed a conserved quantity, as indicated by the condition ∂L/∂t = 0. This means that in systems where the Lagrangian does not explicitly depend on time, the Hamiltonian represents a constant of motion. A common example is the simple harmonic oscillator, where the Hamiltonian corresponds to the total energy of the system, combining kinetic and potential energy. The discussion also touches on deriving Hamilton's equations to further validate this relationship. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing dynamic systems in classical mechanics.
eman2009
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
if the lagrangian is time homogenous ,the hamiltonian is a constant of the motion .
Is this statement correct ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if \frac{\partial L}{\partial t}=0 then the hamiltonian is a conserved quantity. So yes. If the lagrangian doesn't explicitly depend on time, H is conserved.
 
can you give me example ?
 
well, the typical situation (where your coordinates are somewhat normal (ie, can be related somehow to the cartesian coordinate system in a time independent fashion) then the hamiltonian is the energy of the system.

ie, simple harmonic oscillator:

L=T-U= 1/2 m x'^2 - 1/2 k x^2

where m is the mass, k is the spring constant, the first term is the kinetic energy (1/2 m v^2) and the second term is the potential (1/2 k x^2)

in this case H=T+U = Kinetic Energy + Potential Energy = Total Energy = Constant
 
Mandatory exercise: Derive Hamilton's equations and prove the result.
 
how we can explain the differential of lagrangian is a perfect ?L dt
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top