Explanation of Bernouilli's principal of lift?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xckycheezwhizx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation Lift
AI Thread Summary
Bernoulli's principle of lift can be understood by considering how air flows over a wing, which is typically curved downward. This curvature causes the wing to push air downwards, resulting in an upward force on the wing due to Newton's third law, thereby creating lift. For beginners, it's recommended to avoid the complexities of the Bernoulli equation and focus instead on simpler visualizations of lift. A link to a NASA resource is suggested as an excellent non-mathematical explanation. Understanding these basic concepts provides a foundational grasp of how lift is generated in aviation.
xckycheezwhizx
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have a diagram and/or explination of Bernouilli's principal of lift?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ummm, maybe somethin g less complicated, i am new to physics and i do not understand all of the lingo yet.
 
Take a look at the link posted there by pervect. It is from a NASA site.
 
xckycheezwhizx said:
Does anyone have a diagram and/or explination of Bernouilli's principal of lift?
I STRONGLY advise you to follow Clausius2's suggestion of using pervect's link.
It's an excellent source.

Just a hint, though:

Let us take the simplest case, and just assume that the air always flows smoothly over the wing. (much of the technicality in my thread is to problematize just that assumption)

Because a wing is typically "downwardly curved", saying that the air always follows the wing is the same as to say that the wing pushes the air downwards. (Think about that..)

But since then the wing push the air downwards, the air will push the wing upwards, according to Newton's 3.law.
That is, we have lift!

This is, I think, the simplest way of visualizing how the lift is achieved;
note, however, that more detailed arguments is needed to make your ideas rigourous (Jeff Reid&Clausius make several important observations here).

So, as long as you haven't learned all the maths yet, I advise you to forget about the "Bernoulli equation".
Its role in an actual lift situation is rather tricky, many have misunderstood how it should be applied.

Again, go to pervect's link; it's one of the best non-mathematical sources I've seen which visualize the lift situation.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top