Explanation of density and floatation

AI Thread Summary
An object floats if its density is lower than that of the surrounding medium, while it sinks if its density is higher. The discussion clarifies that Bernoulli's theorem is not applicable to buoyancy, which is instead governed by the pressure variations in a stationary fluid due to gravity and depth. The buoyant force on a submerged object is derived from integrating the pressure exerted by the fluid at various depths, which equals the weight of the displaced fluid. This relationship confirms that the buoyant force is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately applying the concepts of density and flotation.
Thundagere
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
We know that an object with lower density than the medium it's in will float, and higher density will sink. Could someone provide proof of this in an equation format? I've been trying to use Bernoulli's theorem, but I feel like I'm doing something wrong.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bernoulli's principle relates the pressure in a moving fluid to the velocity of a fluid. It has nothing to do with buoyancy.

Buoyancy works because the pressure of a [stationary] fluid varies according to the acceleration of gravity, the depth of the fluid and the density of the fluid.

I'm going to dumb this down a bit and hope that it makes intuitive sense...

Consider a shape that is partially immersed in water. Like a boat for instance. Ignore the part that extends above the surface of the water. The outline of the boat encloses a certain area on the surface of the water.

Take the integral of the depth of displaced water at each point within this outline times the incremental surface area at that point. [If you're not familiar with integral calculus, just slice the volume of the boat up into a lot of tiny vertical columns and add up their individual volumes]

Claim 1: This integral is equal to the volume of the water displaced by the boat.

Multiply by the density of the water.

Claim 2: This integral is now equal to the mass of water displaced by the boat.

Now multiply by the acceleration of gravity.

Claim 3: This integral is now equal to the weight of water displaced by the boat.

Consider the upward pressure from the water under each point on the boat.

The pressure at each point under the boat is equal to the depth at that point times the fluid density times the acceleration of gravity. Force over a particular incremental surface area on the boat's bottom is given by multiplying this pressure times the incremantal surface area. The _upward_ component of this force is given by multiplying this pressure times the corresponding horizontal area on the surface of the water.

Claim 4: Integrating this gives the total upward buoyant force on the boat.

Claim 5: This integral is exactly the same as the previous integral

Conclusion: The buoyant force on a [partially] submerged object is exactly equal to the weight of the displaced fluid.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top