Explanation of quadratic divergence in higgs mechanism

pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hi can anyone explain what a quadratic divergence is? and if so how it effects the mass of the scalar field i.e why m^2 = m^2_{0} + \delta m^2, why are these things squared?

Also how would this divergence affect the standard model as a natural concept, because from reading books it would seem that this introduces an intolerable amount of fine tumning making the SM as a standalone seem ridiculous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pleasehelpmeno said:
Hi can anyone explain what a quadratic divergence is? and if so how it effects the mass of the scalar field i.e why m^2 = m^2_{0} + \delta m^2, why are these things squared?
How much do you know about quantum field theory?

Also how would this divergence affect the standard model as a natural concept, because from reading books it would seem that this introduces an intolerable amount of fine tumning making the SM as a standalone seem ridiculous.
Precision measurements and the newly found particle indicate a Higgs mass ##m \approx 125 GeV##, while ##\delta m^2## is of the order of 1019 GeV, and requires ##m_0## to be fine-tuned to get such a small difference.
 
I no a bit but not much, never covered this before though.

Since the fine tuning is so small then would it imply that the SM is invalid or does it imply that it is valid providing there is a higher energy e.g. super-symmetric model?
 
fine tuning is provided by weinberg mixing angle.it does not imply any invalidity of SM.however it is not a part of SM to derive the angle.beyond the standard model things like supersymmetry and GUT can yield this theoretically.A quadratic divergence is mainly associated with an integral which diverges quadratically in high energy limit.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top