Explicit Formula for Sum of Series

[Andy111]

Homework Statement

Determine an explicit formula for the sum of n terms for the given series:

1, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{5}

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I calculated the first 5 terms for the sum sequence and got:

1, \frac{3}{2}, \frac{11}{6}, \frac{25}{12}, \frac{137}{60}

but I can't find a pattern to determine an explicit formula.

 

[steelphantom]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question, but wouldn't it just be \sum_{n=1}^\infty 1/n ?

 

[BrendanH]

The question asks for n terms, not an infinite number of terms

 

[steelphantom]

Oh, sorry. I read the original post too quickly.

 

[BrendanH]

That's alright, nothing to bash heads in about! As for the problem, it's a doozy...

 

[steelphantom]

You're right, it is a doozy! This series is known as a harmonic series, and according to http://plus.maths.org/issue12/features/harmonic/index.html" , "there is no simple formula, akin to the formulae for the sums of arithmetic and geometric series, for the sum."

 

[sutupidmath]

Well then wouldn't it just be:

\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k}

S_1=1

S_2=1+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{2+1}{2}

S_3=1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}=\frac{6+3+2}{6}

S_4=1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{12+6+4+3}{12}

blah, that doesn't actually seem to work!

 

[BrendanH]

I know! It's whack!

I started out trying to find formulas for numerator and denominator separately. In cases where it doesn't simplify, the denominator is n! . As for the numerator, aside from the obvious (n! + n!/2 + n!/3+...+n!/n) I do not see how to arrive at a formula.

 

[Dick]

According to http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HarmonicSeries.html you can write it as a sum of the Euler-Mascheroni constant and a digamma function. I'm guessing if there were an easier expression they would have mentioned it. I think steelphantom is right, there is no elementary formula.

 

[blacklingo]

I think all it is is sigma from k=2 to n of 1/n. very simple that would start off with one half then one third then one quarter and so on.

 

[quantumdude]

That much is obvious. The trouble is finding a formula for the nth partial sum.

 

[beanny007]

I think it's impossible, infinity would be the common denominator.

 

[Mark44]

I think it's impossible, infinity would be the common denominator.

Not for the sum of n (a finite number) terms.

 

[icystrike]

I think it's impossible, infinity would be the common denominator.

The denominator ought to be the lcm(1,2,...,n) whereas the numerator is the puzzle.