Explicitly dependent on time Lagrangian

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Time
AI Thread Summary
To eliminate explicit time dependence from the given Lagrangian, a transformation of the form q -> \bar{q} = qf(\alpha + be^{-\alpha t}) is suggested. The discussion highlights the challenges faced in achieving a satisfactory solution despite significant effort. Participants are seeking methods or insights that could assist in transforming the Lagrangian appropriately. The conversation emphasizes the need for a systematic approach rather than relying solely on visual inspection. Overall, the goal is to find a viable transformation to achieve a time-independent Lagrangian.
Magister
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I need to turn this Lagrangian in one that is not explicitly dependent on time.

<br /> L = \frac{\alpha}{2} (q^\prime + qbe^{-\alpha t})^2-q^2 \frac{ab}{2} e^{-\alpha t} (\alpha +b e^{-\alpha t})- \frac{k q^2}{2}<br /> <br />

I have already spent a lot of time around this problem but I am far from getting a satisfactory answer. Is there any method for doing this or is just by looking? Any help would be great! Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a transformation q -&gt;\bar{q }= qf(\alpha + be^{-\alpha t}) that puts the explicit time dependence into q ?
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top