Can You Recommend Books on Category Theory Without Set Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reedeegi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding resources for learning category theory without relying on set theory. A key reference mentioned is MacLane's "Categories for the Working Mathematician," which includes a section on foundational aspects of category theory. The conversation also touches on related topics such as topos theory, with participants noting their interest in works like Mac Lane's "Sheaves in Geometry and Logic" and Goldblatt's "Topoi." Additionally, there is mention of a paper that axiomatizes a large category without formal set theory, which could be of interest to those exploring category theory's foundations. Overall, the thread highlights a search for alternative approaches to understanding category theory beyond traditional set-theoretic frameworks.
Reedeegi
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know of a book on Category Theory that purposely attempts to teach category theory without explicitly basing it upon set theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~hsimmons/BOOKS/CatTheory.pdf" . Also the appendix on Foundations in MacLane's Categories for the Working Mathematician is a direct presentation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, yes, I see that MacLane's book does indeed include such a section; thank you!
 
What is the intent of your question? Maybe there are other interesting things out there you would find interesting -- topos theory comes to mind.

I know that someone (don't remember who) wrote a paper on directly axiomatizing the (super-large) 2-category of large categories, without reference to a formal set theory. Of course, his axioms provide for the construction of a large category Set, but I don't remember how that turns out to look. Maybe you'd find that interesting if you can find it?
 
Yes, I've been able to track down and purchase books on topos theory; including Mac Lane's Sheaves in Geometry and Logic and Goldblatt's Topoi; also, that article you referenced may be Colin McLarty's one on axiomatizing the category of categories; does this ring a bell?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
896
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top