Exploring Excess Charge on a Capacitor with Gauss's Theorem

maburne2
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,
I am working through all my graduate texts a couple problems each simultaneously to begin to see any overlap in physics. Anyhow, I started working on Jackson and the first problem has me using Gauss's theorem to prove any excess charge on a capacitor must exist on the surface. Informally I get it, due to the closed integral-then yes any excess charge is excluded from the charge density encompassed by the capacitor-but is there a rigorous mathematical way of showing this exclusivity? I thought about approaching it using work, i.e. applying a electric field to the capacitor to show that the work done on the charges in the capacitor is zero while the integral for the work done on the excess charge is nonzero.

Thanks for any and all help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't this just a consequence of the fact that there cannot be an electric field inside a conductor due to the requirement of electrostatics?
 
I agree, but I am trying to find a quantitative method of proving this rather than qualitative.
 
Well, if you had charge within a surface, you can use Gauss's theorem to prove that there must be an electric field inside the conductor, thereby contradicting your original assumptions. Isn't that proof enough?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top