Can Varying the Gravitational Constant Mimic General Relativity's Effects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Gravity
John15
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Hope this is the right forum as I am having a little trouble finding my around the site.
Just a thought and I don't know if it makes sense but could the results on gravitation in GR be duplicated using a variable gravity constant in Newtonian. I was thinking of using something like density to vary the GC.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no variation of Newtonian gravity that reproduces GR. There have been attempts made, like introducing propagation delay, varying G etc.

Newtonian gravity is rather like GR without spatial curvature, where only the time-curvature is operating. The weak field limit of GR approximates Newtonian gravity very closely, so it's more a case of how Newtonian gravity comes from GR rather than the other way around.
 
Can I assume that includes giving all different density/velocity/masses and the space inbetween differing g constants
 
John15 said:
Can I assume that includes giving all different density/velocity/masses and the space inbetween differing g constants

I don't have enough knowledge about the topic to answer that, even if I understood it.:wink:
 
John15 said:
Hope this is the right forum as I am having a little trouble finding my around the site.
Just a thought and I don't know if it makes sense but could the results on gravitation in GR be duplicated using a variable gravity constant in Newtonian. I was thinking of using something like density to vary the GC.
No. That would be a scalar field and AFAIK, the GR field cannot even in principle be represented as a scalar field except in the case of static spacetimes.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top