Can Grid Theory Define the Smallest Possible Movement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoesKepler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grid Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of the smallest possible movement and whether a grid-like system can define it. The Planck length, approximately 1.0x10^-35 cm, is often referenced as a threshold where different physical phenomena may occur, but it does not necessarily imply a discrete grid of space. Participants express skepticism about measuring distances smaller than the Planck length, noting that current physics does not support the idea of continuous subdivisions beyond this limit. The conversation highlights the challenge of reconciling quantum mechanics with theories of gravity and the limitations of our measurement capabilities. Ultimately, the topic touches on the intersection of physics and metaphysics without reaching a definitive conclusion.
JoesKepler
I was just curious, has there been any theories on how small of a movement is possible?
For example, moving an atom a certain length, then moving it half that length, then again half, is there a point when you would get to the smallest movement possible (looking at it as the smallest unit of a 'grid' type system), or could it go on continuously?
I understand this is most likely metaphysics, but would anyone know of any published theories or thoughts with this issue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no established theory that predicts discrete space, but the current crop of grand unified theories (string theory etc...) is exploring this idea in the context of quantum gravity.

Someone will probably mention the Planck length, which is the length at which...well we expect something different to happen in the neighborhood of the Planck length.
 
I asked this question once on Anandtech's HT forum. I got a lot of answers talking about the Planck length.

I'm not sure if my comprehension of this unit is correct, but I don't think it has anything to do with the theory being mentioned (well, at least it does not answer the question).

The Planck length something like 1.0x10^-35 cm. Say this much is the Planck length (just for demonstration purposes)

Code:
|          |

The Planck length is that much, but we can measure a Planck length in intervals less than that length, such as:
Code:
|          |
   |          |
       |          |

Is this correct? It's not really a "grid" with a scale of 1.0x10^-35 cm, it's just the smallest unit which fits our current, complete grasp of physics.
 
We are far, very far (I mean very, very far) to measure something 10^{10} bigger than the Plank length.
The smaller distance we can measure is about 1/10 of an atom, that is 10^{-11} meters.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top