Exploring Maxwell-Boltzmann Statistics for Electrons in Metals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Maxwell-Boltzmann (MB) statistics cannot accurately describe electrons in metals at room temperature (approximately 300 K) due to the high electron density and the Fermi Temperature, which is around 10,000 K. At temperatures below the Fermi Temperature, the Pauli exclusion principle dominates, preventing electrons from occupying the same quantum state. Consequently, MB statistics are only applicable when the probability of two electrons occupying the same state is negligible, which is not the case in typical metallic conditions. Even in extreme environments, such as the surface of the sun, MB statistics remain invalid for electron systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi Temperature and its implications in electron systems
  • Knowledge of Pauli exclusion principle and its effects on electron behavior
  • Familiarity with statistical mechanics, particularly Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics
  • Basic concepts of quantum gases and their behavior at low temperatures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Fermi-Dirac statistics in electron systems
  • Explore the relationship between particle mass and Fermi Temperature
  • Investigate conditions under which Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics become applicable
  • Learn about quantum gases and their characteristics at high densities
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying statistical mechanics or solid-state physics, particularly those interested in the behavior of electrons in metals and the application of statistical theories.

adwodon
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Ok so my question is as follows:

Can Maxwell Boltzmann statistics be used to describe electrons in a metal at room temperature?

I know that the Fermi Temperature in metals is about 10^4 K or something rather high, so does that mean that the metal / electron gas would need to be at a temperature of over 10^4K to be described by MB Statistics? So at room temp of about 300k

What about if the electrons were all replaced with something much heavier, say muons (approx 200x mass). What would you use then? My understanding is quantum gases occur at low temperatures / high densities (when the concentration is higher than the quantum concentration?) so does that mean the fermi temperature would be higher?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


the fermi temp is inversely proportiional to particl mass
 


well, as far as i know, its only at high temperature that fermi-dirac, bose-einstein and maxwell-boltzmann statistics amount to the same thing-if u look at some graph. and room temperature isn't high temperature, right? so maxwell Boltzmann stats can't b used.
correct me if I am wrong
 


No it can't. The electron density is too high and the Fermi Temp is on the order of a few thousand Kelvin. Thus, electrons are not excited far above the Fermi Temperature and there is a fairly well defined fermi surface that can be examined experimentally. There simply is not enough thermal scattering to get you to the maxwell-boltzmann limit.
 


blueyellow said:
well, as far as i know, its only at high temperature that fermi-dirac, bose-einstein and maxwell-boltzmann statistics amount to the same thing-if u look at some graph. and room temperature isn't high temperature, right? so maxwell Boltzmann stats can't b used.
correct me if I am wrong

It is appropriate to use MB statistics on an electron system when the probability of two electrons ever vying for the same state is extremely small. In other words if the effect of pauli-exclusion is insignificant. This is definitely not the case below the Fermi temperature where the vast majority of electrons are stuck in the first available state dictated by the pauli-exclusion principle. In fact this wouldn't even be valid on the surface of the sun, much less room temperature.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K