Where Does the Momentum of a Rolling Ball Go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 529879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Momentum
AI Thread Summary
A heavy rolling ball stops due to friction, raising the question of where its momentum goes. The momentum is not lost but rather transferred, causing a minuscule movement of the Earth. This movement is countered by the initial force used to start the ball rolling, suggesting that momentum is conserved overall. While friction alters the ball's momentum, it does not result in a net loss like kinetic energy does. Ultimately, momentum is conserved in all interactions, including those involving friction.
member 529879
If a heavy ball is rolling on a surface, it eventually stops due to the frictional force. Where does the momentum of that ball go? Is it lost to heat, or does it maybe cause the Earth to move a very small and unnoticeable amount?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It causes the Earth to move a very small and unnoticeable amount. But you had to have moved the Earth a small and unnoticeable amount when you started the ball rolling so, this should just cancel that out roughly (the center of mass has shifted by a little bit in the process).
 
  • Like
Likes member 529879
So is momentum not lost to friction in the same way that kinetic energy is?
 
Scheuerf said:
So is momentum not lost to friction in the same way that kinetic energy is?

Friction is a force and as such changes the momentum of the ball. But Newton's 3rd law says every force has an equal and opposite reaction force so that momentum is conserved. You could perhaps lose a little bit of momentum to pieces of the ground chipping or to the surrounding air or something, but you would probably just lump those elements together into "Earth".
 
  • Like
Likes member 529879
Scheuerf said:
So is momentum not lost to friction in the same way that kinetic energy is?

No. Momentum is always conserved in any type of collision.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top