Exploring System Energy in Statistical Mechanics

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
In my notes,

http://www.ph.ed.ac.uk/~pmonthou/Statistical-Mechanics/documents/SM3.pdf

on page 1 we are told we're dealing with systems of fixed total E but in the expilicit example on page 3, do we not find 4 different values for the total energy. how is this possible?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Right. The point is to look at how many different microstates (arrangements of up/down spins) correspond to the same macrostate (total energy). This is used to give us entropy as a function of total energy, S(E).

Notice that total energy is still an input parameter. So once we find the function S(E), we can fix E to be any particular allowed value.
 
yes but this is supposed to be an isolated system hence E is fixed

yet in the table we have E being -3mH, -mH +mH, +3mH which means it's not fixed. i guess i just can't really follow your argument sorry
 
We're not talking about a single system, but an ensemble of many possible systems. Each of those systems has a different energy and entropy. Your notes describe how to find the entropy as a function of energy, S(E).

Once we know S(E), we can then calculate properties of any particular system of some given energy E.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top