What Are the Characteristic Lengths for the Biot Number in Different Shapes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gfd43tg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Characteristic
AI Thread Summary
The Biot number (Bi) is defined as Bi = hLc/k, where Lc represents the characteristic length. For different shapes, the characteristic lengths are derived from the volume and surface area, with Lc typically calculated as Vbody/Asurface. There is some confusion regarding the application of the Biot number, particularly around the threshold of 0.1, which influences heat transfer characteristics but does not alter the definition of Lc. The discussion emphasizes that while the Biot number is important for understanding heat flow resistance, the characteristic length can vary based on the context and specific shape being analyzed. Ultimately, the choice of characteristic length, such as using the radius for spheres, is often guided by established charts and references in the literature.
gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
48
Hello

I confused about the equation for the biot number

Bi = hLc/k

For a slab, sphere, and cylinder, what are the characteristic lengths?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Maylis said:
Hello

I confused about the equation for the biot number

Bi = hLc/k

For a slab, sphere, and cylinder, what are the characteristic lengths?

According to this article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biot_number

the characteristic length Lc is usually the volume of the body divided by its surface area, or

Lc = Vbody/Asurface
 
I think that is for biot numbers less than 0.1
 
Maylis said:
I think that is for biot numbers less than 0.1

If you read the quoted article, it discusses what the implications are for Biot Nos. < 0.1 and Biot Nos. > 0.1 of an object in terms of heat transfer. It does not, however, indicate that Lc is modified depending on the value of the Biot No., as you could never tell if you are calculating the correct Biot No. with such a definition.

If the Wiki definition is not satisfactory, try this one:

http://www.tufts.edu/as/tampl/en43/lecture_notes/ch4.html

or this one:

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/chemical...ng-spring-2007/lecture-notes/biot_numbers.pdf
 
Yes, the tufts article is where I am getting the 0.1 figure from. I'm just confused because our professor told us something contradictory, basically the the characteristic length is one half the diameter
 
"Characteristic lengths" in fluid dynamics are not an exact science. In the Tufts article, the behavior of the system doesn't suddenly change to something completely different when the non-dimensional parameter changes from 0.0999 to 0.1001. The important thing is the physical interpretation i.e. the "resistance" to heat flow across the surface, compared with the "resistance" inside the body, and what that means for the way the temperature varies with time. At one extreme, the surface temperature stays almost constant. At the other extreme, the internal temperatures stay almost uniform.
 
See how McAdams defines the Biot number for various shapes. Also, check out how Bird et al do it.

Chet
 
It turns out that we use the radius because the charts given to us use that as the characteristic length
 
Back
Top