Can a Charge to Planck Mass Ratio Be Validly Calculated?

Meselwulf
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Is there anything wrong in saying there can be a charge to Planck Mass ratio?

I calculate it as

\frac{e}{M_p} \propto 1.861 721 726 984 943 \times 10^{-10} C/kg

But I find no references by any science that they have done this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apparently no one has calculated it before for a Planck Mass, but it is a perfectly valid move. I was doing this for my investigation into Planck Particles (micro black holes) which exist for roughly a Planck Time.

Thanks anyway.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top