What Are the Values of Matrices β, αk, pk in the Dirac Equation?

AleksanderPhy
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hello there I have a problem about Dirac equation
36725c97374cea9194a5e035be2c2b60.png

So I want to know what is matrices β,αk,pk value. And is it right that with Dirac equation we can calculate every particle spin and how we take dervitative of Ψ(x,t) and what is Ψ(x,t) value.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The matrices ##\beta##, ##\alpha_k## are 4x4 Hermitian matrices and are defined by the Clifford algebra, which means that in this notation they satisfy ( {,} is the anticommutator and 1 is the unity matrix):

##\{\alpha^i,\alpha^j\} = 2 \delta^{ij}##
##\{\alpha^i,\beta\} = 0##
##\beta^2 = 1##

Their explicit matrix elements depend on which of these you want to make diagonal (Dirac representation, Chiral representation, Majorana representation...). The ##p^k## is not a matrix but the momentum operator which becomes a quantum operator in the form of a spatial derivative: so the one you posted is the free Dirac equation in which ##\psi## is the eigenfuction unknown, a bispinor (4 component spinor). Solving for ##\psi## in the Dirac representation you find (after a lengthy calculation) the normalized eigenfunctions for positive and negative energy eigenvalues. And then you can change representations using the appropriate transformation matrices.
 
  • Like
Likes Matterwave and AleksanderPhy
Thanks(;
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top